1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00384298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home range geometry of the desert scorpion Paruroctonus mesaensis

Abstract: The home range of the desert scorpion Paruroctonus mesaensis is analyzed using techniques of Ford & Krumme (1979). Possible factors influencing home range geomtry of P. mesaensis include prey distribution, prey abundance and renewal, energy requirements, risk of predation and body size. There are differences in home range size among the three year classes with the youngest year class maintaining a significantly smaller home range. Home ranges of each year class are approximately circular indicating that these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, body size, prey use, foraging behavior, home range, microhabitat use, temporal (seasonal and die!) patterns, and intra-and interspecific interactions change greatly during growth (Polis 1979(Polis , 1984aMcCormick 1986a, 1987;Polis et al 1985). For example, foraging age classes of the scorpion Paruroctonus mesaensis increase 60-80x in weight from 0.03 g (instar 2) to 2.0-2.5 g (nongravid adults); instar 2 individuals eat prey that average 5 mm in length whereas adults use prey averaging three times larger, two-thirds of which are different species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, body size, prey use, foraging behavior, home range, microhabitat use, temporal (seasonal and die!) patterns, and intra-and interspecific interactions change greatly during growth (Polis 1979(Polis , 1984aMcCormick 1986a, 1987;Polis et al 1985). For example, foraging age classes of the scorpion Paruroctonus mesaensis increase 60-80x in weight from 0.03 g (instar 2) to 2.0-2.5 g (nongravid adults); instar 2 individuals eat prey that average 5 mm in length whereas adults use prey averaging three times larger, two-thirds of which are different species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consequently, individuals have limited home ranges which generally are restricted to small areas around their burrows [15]. Strong genetic differentiation has previously been observed for scorpion species and was probably triggered by barriers such as high elevations, steep valleys or sea barriers [16][19] in combination with low dispersal ability of the organisms [20]. In addition to being extremely limited, dispersal is also highly asymmetrical in these organisms, with male scorpions dispersing more widely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it can be assumed that scorpion populations inhabited the Mediterranean islands during the MSC and exchanged genes during the establishment of land bridges. Second, it is likely that the populations subsequently remained isolated, as scorpions show extremely low dispersal rates (annually 1-30 m; Polis et al 1985), and genetic data on allozymes and nuclear and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences suggest a strong population structure with high F ST -estimates between subpopulations and low dispersal rates (Yamashita and Polis 1995;Gantenbein et al 2001;Gantenbein 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%