2005
DOI: 10.1894/0038-4909(2005)050[0323:hrhusa]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home Range, Habitat Use, Survival, and Fecundity of Mexican Spotted Owls in the Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While many other studies of spotted owl foraging have not explicitly accounted for this effect (e.g. Carey et al 1990;Ganey and Balda 1994;Ganey et al 2005;Hamer et al 2007;Bowden 2008;Williams et al 2011;Forsman et al 2015;Comfort et al 2016; also see Singleton et al 2010 for barred owl), we (Jones et al 2016: 303) did because we eliminated foraging locations beyond the 95 th percentile of foraging distances so that "…distant areas rarely visited by owls in foraging bouts (Bond et al 2009) were not counted as 'available' habitat. As a result, the analysis consisted of GPS locations that occurred within distance ranges used at relatively high frequencies…."…”
Section: The Science Of Spotted Owls and Firementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many other studies of spotted owl foraging have not explicitly accounted for this effect (e.g. Carey et al 1990;Ganey and Balda 1994;Ganey et al 2005;Hamer et al 2007;Bowden 2008;Williams et al 2011;Forsman et al 2015;Comfort et al 2016; also see Singleton et al 2010 for barred owl), we (Jones et al 2016: 303) did because we eliminated foraging locations beyond the 95 th percentile of foraging distances so that "…distant areas rarely visited by owls in foraging bouts (Bond et al 2009) were not counted as 'available' habitat. As a result, the analysis consisted of GPS locations that occurred within distance ranges used at relatively high frequencies…."…”
Section: The Science Of Spotted Owls and Firementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annual rates of decline in 2 demography studies ranged from almost 20%/year in a study that included 4 mountain ranges (Black Range and Magdalena, San Mateo, and Zuni Mountains) in New Mexico (Stacey and Peery , Stacey ), to approximately 14% on the Coconino Plateau, north‐central Arizona, and slightly >10%/year in the Tularosa Mountains, New Mexico (Seamans et al ). Similarly, Ganey et al () estimated λ for 2 small study areas in the Sacramento Mountains from 1992 through 1994, using data from radio‐marked owls and the methods of Pulliam (). Estimates of λ indicated an annual decline of 30% in one study area (referred to as xeric) and 4% in the second (mesic, this area was entirely contained within our current study area).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasons for the differences among studies are unknown. Analytical techniques have improved since earlier studies were conducted, and the reparameterized Jolly‐Seber model used in this study is highly preferred over the stage‐projection matrix models used in previous demography studies (Franklin et al , Boyce et al , Anthony et al , Forsman et al ), or the relatively crude method used by Ganey et al (). The use of different modeling techniques is not sufficient to explain differences in trend estimates between the demography studies, however, because empirical data supported model‐based trends in all studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations