2000
DOI: 10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<0408:hrotsb>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HOME RANGE OF THE SOUTHERN BLOSSOM BAT,SYCONYCTERIS AUSTRALIS,IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If a bat was flying or at a roost only briefly, position sighted along a single bearing and distance was estimated from signal strength and gain (Law & Lean 1999, Winkelmann et al 2000, Bernard & Fenton 2003. Tracking stations were established at mapped reference locations usually within 20-100 m of activity centers for each bat.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a bat was flying or at a roost only briefly, position sighted along a single bearing and distance was estimated from signal strength and gain (Law & Lean 1999, Winkelmann et al 2000, Bernard & Fenton 2003. Tracking stations were established at mapped reference locations usually within 20-100 m of activity centers for each bat.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roost switching, however, may help reduce parasite loads (Lewis 1995; Reckardt & Kerth 2005) or prevent detection of roost sites as reliable prey sources by predators (Fenton et al. 1994; Winkelmann et al. 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2004), probably because of the high availability of roosting resources. These abundant roosting resources, coupled with stable and abundant food resources, may further increase fidelity to particular roosting areas (Winkelmann et al. 2000; Chaverri et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, based on the recapture data, the average nightly foraging movement of the subcanopy frugivorous bats in peninsular Malaysia increases in relation to body mass (Hodgkison 2001). Previous studies showed that in several fruit bat species, males travel shorter distance than females to forage , Nair et al 1999, Winkelman 2000. Using radio tracking techniques, Funakoshi & Zubaid (1997) also showed that the larger C. horsfieldi had about double the home range size of the smaller C. brachyotis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%