1992
DOI: 10.1525/sp.1992.39.2.03x0054b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homeless and Vulnerable Meal Program Users: A Comparison Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
1
4

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
24
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, women were most likely to have seen health providers (through such interventions) during the previous year (Rosengard, Chambers, Tulsky, Long, & Chesney, 2006), Colson (1990) found that younger participants were greater service utilizers than older participants and previous use of services predicts future use (cf. Anderson et al, 1993;Colson, 1990;Sosin, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, women were most likely to have seen health providers (through such interventions) during the previous year (Rosengard, Chambers, Tulsky, Long, & Chesney, 2006), Colson (1990) found that younger participants were greater service utilizers than older participants and previous use of services predicts future use (cf. Anderson et al, 1993;Colson, 1990;Sosin, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second and more speculatively, since past studies link service receipt to the attainment or maintenance of a domicile, it is possible that the differences in service use located here may be linked to the extent to which clients in the various types of programs regain a domicile: studies show that some professional service programs are effective (Bruni 1997), that provision of welfare benefits or similar resources through advocacy helps adults to escape homelessness and maintain dwellings (Sosin 1992;Wong 1997), and that a specific type of employment program, albeit, one that may not be available to many clients, also is an escape route (Becker and Drake 2003). Of course, this evidence is not definitive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control variables represent client personal traits, predilections, and situations that are plausible correlates of both service use 3 and residence in one or more of the types of housing (Wong 1997;Sosin 1992). In particular, the control variables measure client age, gender, race, and ethnicity, whether the client has children with them, the total months spent homeless over the clients lifetime, percent of time the client worked in the last two years, years of alcohol problems, years of use of illegal drugs, existence of a chronic health problem, the availability of resources from members of the social network and the number of days spent in the housing program at the time of the interview.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, emergency food distribution is only one of several service activities in which congregations may engage, and this type of service activity may have particular characteristics, such as fleeting contact with clients, that affect our findings. Second, the homeless are a special population, often with multiple problems other than poverty, including mental health and addiction issues (Blankertz & Cnann, 1994;Klein & Cnaan, 1995;Sosin, 1981Sosin, , 1992. Although these two qualifications rightfully place constraints on the generalizability of our findings, our choice of investigative location also has analogous benefits.…”
Section: Bringing Religion In: the Reproduction Of Problems In Religimentioning
confidence: 96%