2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2005.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homeostatic plasticity and NMDA receptor trafficking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
232
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
4
232
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, specific AMPAr and NMDAr conductances are not affected by changes in putative synaptic weight which, although in line with many theoretical studies of plasticity induction, is clearly at odds with the situation in vivo [18,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. It has been demonstrated that changes in AMPAr conductance associated with the expression of long-term synaptic plasticity are accompanied by concomitant changes in NMDAr conductance [69,76]. This has interesting implications for further synaptic plasticity -as both the level of depolarisation in the spine and the level of NMDAr-dependent Calcium influx generated by that depolarisation will be concurrently modulated, possibly contributing to the 'lock-in' of changes in synaptic conductance observed experimentally [37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, specific AMPAr and NMDAr conductances are not affected by changes in putative synaptic weight which, although in line with many theoretical studies of plasticity induction, is clearly at odds with the situation in vivo [18,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. It has been demonstrated that changes in AMPAr conductance associated with the expression of long-term synaptic plasticity are accompanied by concomitant changes in NMDAr conductance [69,76]. This has interesting implications for further synaptic plasticity -as both the level of depolarisation in the spine and the level of NMDAr-dependent Calcium influx generated by that depolarisation will be concurrently modulated, possibly contributing to the 'lock-in' of changes in synaptic conductance observed experimentally [37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This prediction could be tested through experimental measurements of the NMDAr-[Ca 2+ ] current generated by spike and triplet pairing protocols at different stimulation frequencies. It is well known that the activity-dependent NR2A / NR2B subunit composition of NMDAr has a significant influence on the properties and temporal profile of synaptic currents, particularly at the high and low firing rates associated with LTP and LTD induction [68,69]. Measuring the changes in synaptic strength generated by spike and triplet pairing protocols under regimes of selective pharmacological blockade would also allow the dynamics of kinase and phosphotase activity to be more precisely delineated, providing further data to constrain the corresponding kinetic models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a number of studies have challenged this notion by demonstrating the activitydependent regulation of synaptic NMDA receptor number (Wenthold, et al, 2003). This occurs via regulation of NMDA receptor trafficking, a generic term for movement between different cellular domains such as the ER, golgi, endosomes, and various microdomains on the cell surface including the synapse (Perez-Otano and Ehlers, 2005). Homeostatic enhancement of NMDA receptor clustering at the synapse has also been observed following chronic inhibition of synaptic activity or direct inhibition of NMDA receptors (Rao and Craig, 1997).…”
Section: Nmda Receptor Trafficking and Synaptic Targetingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22][23] These interactions are involved in receptor clustering at the synaptic membrane, downstream signaling including modulation of kinase and phosphatase activity, as well as regulated synaptic trafficking of the NMDA receptor. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] In addition, binding of newly synthesized NMDA receptor subunits to PSD-95 or SAP102 links the receptor to different intracellular trafficking pathways, which is essential for its trafficking from the ER/Golgi complex to the PSD. [31][32][33][34] Changes in the expression of transcripts encoding NMDA receptor subunits in the prefrontal cortex have previously been described in post-mortem schizophrenic brains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%