1981
DOI: 10.1037/h0077838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homeostatic regulation and Pavlovian conditioning in tolerance to amphetamine-induced anorexia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

7
64
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Pavlovian models of drug tolerance (Kesner & Baker, 1981;Poulos & Hinson, 1984;Poulos et al, 1981;Siegel, 1979Siegel, , 1983) specifically predict the elicitation of compensatory CRs by drug-associated cues, the observation of such responses would not provide unequivocal support for the model, even if such observations were consistently reported. This is clear particularly for biphasic responses such as locomotor activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Although Pavlovian models of drug tolerance (Kesner & Baker, 1981;Poulos & Hinson, 1984;Poulos et al, 1981;Siegel, 1979Siegel, , 1983) specifically predict the elicitation of compensatory CRs by drug-associated cues, the observation of such responses would not provide unequivocal support for the model, even if such observations were consistently reported. This is clear particularly for biphasic responses such as locomotor activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, there is also previous research examining conditioning with amphetamine and haloperidol as an US that resulted in opponent or compensatory responses. Thus, for instance, Poulos, Wilkinson, and Cappell [45] conducted a series of experiments examining tolerance to amphetamine-induced anorexia that revealed the occurrence of a compensatory CR that counteracted the drug effect when it was administered in the same context associated with the drug administration. Similarly, tolerance to haloperidol-induced catalepsy in rats was observed only when the animals were exposed to the context previously associated with the drug [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carlton and Wolgin, 1971;Poulos, Wilkinson and Cappell, 1981; Goudie, 1982, 1983;Streather and Hinson, 1985;Wolgin and Salisbury, 1985;Wolgin, Thompson and Oslan, 1987). Carlton and Wolgin (1971) found that animals given amphetamine chronically developed tolerance to anorexia only if milk was available shortly after each amphetamine injection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Poulos, Wilkinson and Cappell (1981) suggested that since interaction with a food stimulus (milk) is necessary for tolerance to develop to amphetamine anorexia the loss of tolerance should also require interaction with a food stimulus. This hypothesis was supported in an experiment (Poulos, Wilkinson and Cappell, 1981) in which rats first acquired tolerance to amphetamine anorexia through the contingent procedure. Tolerance was lost by animals who subsequently received saline injections followed by access to milk but was retained by animals who received saline injections but no access to milk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%