bulk indicator of the summer monsoon. But its use is controversial, largely owing to summer monsoon rainfall's pronounced sub-India and sub-seasonal heterogeneity. Summer rainfall is high within a broadband of northern-central India, higher still within a narrow band in the southwest between the Arabian Sea and the Western Ghats (WG) mountains, and much lower in southeastern India (SEI) between these two bands. And throughout the subcontinent JJAS rainfall variability is much higher on daily than interannual timescales (Krishnamurthy & Shukla, 2000). In this study, we address three long-running controversies regarding AIRI's interpretation in light of this spatiotemporal variability, attempting to synthesize and reconcile past arguments made with differing and often short and/or coarse datasets by using state-of-the-art, 120-year datasets of Indian rainfall at high resolution and of sea surface temperature (SST).First is the relationship between AIRI and the overall spatiotemporal extent of wetting or drying across India. Spatially, in most summers there are parts of India that experience drought and others excess rainfall, and for rain-fed agriculture for example, quite plausibly the spatial extent of drought relative to local rainfall normals is more relevant than the average rainfall anomaly in mm day −1 across India (Parthasarathy et al., 1993). This has motivated attempts to define bulk indices in terms of the fraction of the Indian surface area experiencing rainfall anomalies exceeding specified thresholds (Mooley et al., 1981;Parthasarathy et al., 1987). Temporally, a recent