2004
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogenization of sandwich structures

Abstract: SUMMARYA homogenization method is proposed for sandwich structures consisting of two plates interlaced with beams and shells in a periodic, lattice structure. The proposed method is a quasi-continuum approach where the constitutive response is obtained from the generalized forces of the interlacing elements. Buckling is studied as part of this model. Comparison of the homogenized model with fully discrete models show reasonable to very good agreement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent experiments have shown that the back face deflections of centrally loaded edge clamped sandwich panels can be significantly less than equivalent areal density solid plates subjected to the same loading [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Theoretical assessments indicate this beneficial effect arises from two phenomena: a reduction in the impulse acquired by the sandwich panel front face as a result of a fluid-structure interaction (FSI) effect [3,4,[8][9][10] and the higher flexural stiffness and strength of the sandwich.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent experiments have shown that the back face deflections of centrally loaded edge clamped sandwich panels can be significantly less than equivalent areal density solid plates subjected to the same loading [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Theoretical assessments indicate this beneficial effect arises from two phenomena: a reduction in the impulse acquired by the sandwich panel front face as a result of a fluid-structure interaction (FSI) effect [3,4,[8][9][10] and the higher flexural stiffness and strength of the sandwich.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the beneficial FSI effect had been confirmed in water [2][3][4][5][6][7][8], numerous sandwich panel concepts for impulse and pressure mitigation have been explored [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model was used with finite elements to represent the behavior of square honeycomb sandwich plates [Xue et al 2005], folded plate and pyramidal truss cores , and hexagonal honeycomb cores [Mohr et al 2006] subjected to quasistatic and dynamic loads. Rabczuk et al [2004] developed a homogenization method for sandwich structures using a quasicontinuum approach that takes into account buckling of the core; this model shows good agreement with fully discretized models for shell interlaced cores. Qiu et al [2004;2005a] developed an analytical model for the deformation response of clamped circular sandwich plates subjected to shock loading in air and in water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fleck and Deshpande [6] have developed an analytical model for the impact resistance of clamped sandwich beams by separating the response of these beams into three sequential stages: the fluid-structure interaction stage, the core compression stage and finally a combined beam bending and stretching stage. Some FE simulations [9,13] indicated that the Fleck and Deshpande model may over-estimate or under-estimate the deflection of the sandwich beams under blast loading. These discrepancies have been attributed to the fact that coupling between the stages of the response can cause enlarged or reduced deflections compared with those predicted by the fully decoupled Fleck and Deshpande model.…”
Section: Structural Response Processmentioning
confidence: 99%