2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13178-015-0215-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homophobic Prejudice in Czech Youth: a Sociodemographic Analysis of Young People’s Opinions on Homosexuality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the more advanced age groups revealed such an extent of differences between men and women. Similar conclusions were drawn from the research conducted among the youth in the neighboring Czech Republic (Pitoňák & Spilková, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…None of the more advanced age groups revealed such an extent of differences between men and women. Similar conclusions were drawn from the research conducted among the youth in the neighboring Czech Republic (Pitoňák & Spilková, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…According to Atlas Brazil (2013), the municipal human development index in education, per capita income, and life expectancy of the population, in general, is higher in the states of the South and Southeast and lower in the states of the Northeast: MG (0.638, US $ 232, 75.30 years), RS (0.642, US $ 270, and Students residing and studying in rural areas had a higher level of prejudice compared to the ones in urban areas. International studies point out that students living in urban areas can be more tolerant in having gay man and lesbian woman as classmates compared to the ones living in rural areas (Pitonak & Spilková, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural levels include conditions and factors such as societally and culturally rooted stigmatization and institutional and legal discrimination against sexual minorities (Pachankis et al, 2016). The most common interpersonal factors include interpersonal forms of homonegativity such as hate speech, bullying, or everyday microaggressions (Pitoňák & Spilková, 2016). The individual level is then mostly influenced by psychological and domestic effects, which are moderated by appraisal or by ameliorative conditions such as family or peer support.…”
Section: • 1 Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%