Honesty And Intelligence Judgments Of Individuals And Groups: The Effects Of Entity-related Behavior Diagnosticity And Implicit Theories

Abstract

Two experiments examined trait judgments made from behaviors. Results from an initial experiment suggest that the informativeness of the behaviors, and not peoples' affective responses or approach/avoidance tendencies, best account for the impact of inconsistent information on trait judgments. The results of a second experiment yielded additional support for this idea by showing that when a target's behaviors were inconsistent in their trait implications: (1) negativity effects emerged in judgments of the target's honesty; (2) positivity effects emerged in judgments of the target's intelligence; (3) these effects diminished when the targets were groups rather than individuals; and (4) judgments made by entity theorists were less affected by inconsistent behavior than judgments made by incremental theorists. These effects did not emerge when a target's behaviors were consistent in their implications. Collectively, these results suggest that the usefulness of a behavior for a trait judgment depends on whether the judgment situation prompts participants to evaluate the extent to which a target fits a single trait category or forces a calculation of the target's relative fit to alternative trait categories. The results also suggest that some aspects of trait judgments cannot be explained by evaluative responses to behaviors or to targets.

Morality and competence in person- and self-perception

“…These two cognitive accounts of negativity -positivity effects in the M and C domain are highly convergent and have been confirmed in extensive research using various dependent measures (cf. Reeder, 1993;Skowronski, 2002).…”

Don't rest on your laurels: Reputational change and young technology-based ventures

“…Diagnosticity is a construct studied by social cognition scholars interested in how new information affects people's judgments of other people and products (e.g., Ahluwalia, 2002;Folkes and Patrick, 2003;Skowronski and Carlston, 1987;Skowronski, 2002;Ybarra, 2001). Diagnostic signals are those which enable stakeholders to distinguish between good and poor performers on relevant attributes.…”

Using Diagnostic Text Information to Constrain Situation Models

“…Thus, the diagnostic value of a stimulus depends on the frequency with which this attribute occurs in a given class of stimuli as compared with its frequency in other classes. Often, experiments utilizing the diagnosticity construct rely on the assumption that participants know these frequency distributions, but do not allow diagnosticity to be experimentally controlled (Costello & Keane, 2001;Skowronski, 2002). In these experiments, the diagnostic value of text information followed explicitly and completely from the context information provided by the basic relations (von Hecker, 1997), meaning that diagnosticity could be experimentally manipulated and did not depend on assumptions that were difficult to test.…”