2010
DOI: 10.1504/ijcat.2010.034736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Honeycomb model based skin colour detector for face detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pai et al [246] presented honeycomb model for skin segmentation. First, possible skin colors are estimated from the pixels of database and the honeycomb structure is built in HSV color space according to the training samples.…”
Section: H Mixuret Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pai et al [246] presented honeycomb model for skin segmentation. First, possible skin colors are estimated from the pixels of database and the honeycomb structure is built in HSV color space according to the training samples.…”
Section: H Mixuret Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig.12. The Method Proposed in [246] Hai-bo [247] combined explicitly defined boundary method with single Gaussian in HS color space to detect skin pixels. Jmal et al [248] combined the result of applying boundary rules on RGB space and Bhattacharyya distance between the histogram of these pixels and offline trained histograms.…”
Section: H Mixuret Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated in the survey by Morerio et al . [ 58 ], colour is a simple, but good feature for detecting the location of hands, particularly if a proper colour space is considered, such as Lab, HSV [ 59 ] and YCbCr [ 60 ]. This feature is usually combined with others, such as texture and contours [ 50 , 53 ].…”
Section: Recognition Of Elements Of Activities At the Motion Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 shows the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves with 637 Pareto-optimal solutions of the classification rates (TPR and FPR) derived using the last 1000 test skin images. Moreover, the ETM based threshold decision rules proposed in the early 70 published bibliographies [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] were calculated utilizing the same skin and non-skin data sets for fair comparison. Clearly the Pareto-optimal solutions obtained in this study dominate those of the other 70 publications.…”
Section: Skin Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ETM is commonly used to classify skin and face due to its simplicity of detection rules and computational efficiency [9,18]. In the bibliography various color spaces have been employed to label skin pixels with ETM approach including RGB [19][20][21][22], nRGB [23][24][25], HSV [26-28], HSI [29], YCbCr [30][31][32][33], YCgCr [34,35], YIQlYUV [36] and combination of various color spaces [37][38][39][40]. The main difficulty achieving high performance employing ETM is to find adequate threshold ranges empirically [41] and it is difficult to find accurate threshold settings to obtain desirable performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%