2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2976336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hopping conductivity in Mn-doped β-FeSi2 single crystals

Abstract: The article gives a report on resistivity measurements on Mn-doped p-type FeSi 2 single crystals and analyzes the data within the framework of different hopping conductivity models. Both the Mott ͓N. Mott and E. A. Davies, Electron Processes in Non-Crystalline Materials ͑Clarendon, Oxford, 1979͔͒ and the Shklovskii-Efros ͓B. I. Shklovskii and A. L. Efros, Electronic Properties o0066 Doped Semiconductors ͑Springer, Berlin, 1984͔͒ regimes of the variable-range hopping ͑VRH͒ conductivity are observed. It is shown… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the variation of W = 3.3-18.2 meV in the Co-doped samples is much higher than in the Cr-doped material, 70) indicating a corresponding high variation of the microscopic lattice disorder. 65,66) The Mn-doped p-type β-FeSi 2 exhibits a closeness to the MIT for all investigated samples with a minor dependence on the source stoichiometry, yielding T 04 = 120-410 K and T 02 = 8.2-11.9 K. 72) The values of Δ = 0.33-0.40 meV support the inference made above, whereas those of W = 4.9-8.3 meV suggest the different microscopic disorder in the investigated samples, as well. 72) For sample #L20, the values of ξ ≈ 74 Å, ξ 0 ≈ 7.5 Å (the localization radius far from the MIT, i.e., at N A ≪ N c ), κ ≈ 660, N c ≈ 3.7 × 10 19 cm −3 , and g(E F ) ≈ 2.4 × 10 18 meV −1 •cm −3 have been obtained at N A ≈ 3.3 × 10 18 cm −3 .…”
Section: Hopping Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the variation of W = 3.3-18.2 meV in the Co-doped samples is much higher than in the Cr-doped material, 70) indicating a corresponding high variation of the microscopic lattice disorder. 65,66) The Mn-doped p-type β-FeSi 2 exhibits a closeness to the MIT for all investigated samples with a minor dependence on the source stoichiometry, yielding T 04 = 120-410 K and T 02 = 8.2-11.9 K. 72) The values of Δ = 0.33-0.40 meV support the inference made above, whereas those of W = 4.9-8.3 meV suggest the different microscopic disorder in the investigated samples, as well. 72) For sample #L20, the values of ξ ≈ 74 Å, ξ 0 ≈ 7.5 Å (the localization radius far from the MIT, i.e., at N A ≪ N c ), κ ≈ 660, N c ≈ 3.7 × 10 19 cm −3 , and g(E F ) ≈ 2.4 × 10 18 meV −1 •cm −3 have been obtained at N A ≈ 3.3 × 10 18 cm −3 .…”
Section: Hopping Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…65,66) The Mn-doped p-type β-FeSi 2 exhibits a closeness to the MIT for all investigated samples with a minor dependence on the source stoichiometry, yielding T 04 = 120-410 K and T 02 = 8.2-11.9 K. 72) The values of Δ = 0.33-0.40 meV support the inference made above, whereas those of W = 4.9-8.3 meV suggest the different microscopic disorder in the investigated samples, as well. 72) For sample #L20, the values of ξ ≈ 74 Å, ξ 0 ≈ 7.5 Å (the localization radius far from the MIT, i.e., at N A ≪ N c ), κ ≈ 660, N c ≈ 3.7 × 10 19 cm −3 , and g(E F ) ≈ 2.4 × 10 18 meV −1 •cm −3 have been obtained at N A ≈ 3.3 × 10 18 cm −3 . 72) The values of ξ ≫ ξ 0 and κ ≫ κ 0 (where κ 0 = 29.9 is the value of the dielectric permittivity far from the MIT) 73) support the close proximity to the MIT, which is in agreement with the relations [74][75][76] where ν and η are the critical exponents of the localization radius and the dielectric permittivity, respectively.…”
Section: Hopping Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where T* is the characteristic temperature, and q is the parameter determining the Mott-type (q=2) or the Shklovskii-Efros (SE) type (q=4) variable-range hopping (VRH) conduction [23][24][25][26]. Figures 5(a) Figs.…”
Section: Electrical Properties Of Impurity-doped Basimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2(b). Non-linear behaviors were observed, meaning that the carrier transport cannot be explained by variable range hopping, [14][15][16] differently from Ga-, Cu-, and Ag-doped BaSi 2 . Similar results were obtained for other samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%