1994
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<1777:hdoeam>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Horizontal Distribution of Electrical and Meteorological Conditions across the Stratiform Region of a Mesoscale Convective System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
176
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
15
176
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower positive charge layer sloped less, perhaps constrained by the presence of the melting level (4.8 km MSL on 20 June). These lightning-mapped charge layers likely did not include other thin layers that often are revealed in balloon studies [Marshall and Rust, 1993;Stolzenburg et al, 1994Stolzenburg et al, , 2001Marshall et al, 2001], and thus the full stratiform charge structure may have been more complex than shown here.…”
Section: Observations On 9 May 2007mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lower positive charge layer sloped less, perhaps constrained by the presence of the melting level (4.8 km MSL on 20 June). These lightning-mapped charge layers likely did not include other thin layers that often are revealed in balloon studies [Marshall and Rust, 1993;Stolzenburg et al, 1994Stolzenburg et al, , 2001Marshall et al, 2001], and thus the full stratiform charge structure may have been more complex than shown here.…”
Section: Observations On 9 May 2007mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…[10] Both charge advection and in situ charging are important in MCS stratiform regions [Stolzenburg et al, 1994;Schuur and Rutledge, 2000b], and these two processes may account for different charge layers [Shepherd et al, 1996;Carey et al, 2005;Lang and Rutledge, 2008] as well as different classes of stratiform +CG lightning [Rutledge et al, 1990]. Therefore, it is hypothesized that the relationships between sprite production and MCS intensity and structure may be complex, and may depend on the dominant sprite-parent charge layer, and on the dominant physical process (charge advection or in situ) that led to the creation of that layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent simulations by of an ideal supercellular storm case, using a 3-D mesoscale model with an explicit lightning flash scheme, give some hints in this direction. Furthermore, conceptual models of the electrical structure in a mesoscale convective system (MCS) by Stolzenburg et al (1994) and in a supercell by Wiens et al (2005) (both storm types related to elevated wind shear) indicate that the charged regions in the upper part of the cloud may stretch far away from the convective region with precipitation. A lateral displacement of upper level charge on the convective scale (∼10 km) because of vertical wind shear (0-6 km) was first suggested by Pierce (1955), Brook et al (1982), Ray et al (1987), and Hill (1988) (known as "tilted dipole mechanism").…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MCSs producing elves and sprites the charge regions appear to be more sheet-like than point-like [Krehbiel, 1981;Stolzenburg et al, 1994; IIIIII/!11111 The mean return stroke current associated with the elves is roughly twice that for the sprites on the basis of the results in Figure 13. In contrast, the return stroke extension may pervade the lower layer (Figure 16b) more easily to produce long continuing current than it does in the upper sheet, owing to the larger potential drop in the longer vertical channel in the latter case.…”
Section: Distinct Differences In Elf Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%