1976
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.6010.621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hormonal assessment before and after vasectomy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their report, Smith et al demonstrated differential changes in the hormonal levels between the first and second year after vasectomy [15]. The higher level of testosterone in azoospermia obtained in the present study is in agreement with the results of Skegg et al, who reported a greater rise in testosterone levels 6 yr after vasectomy [14]. The studies by Purvis et al, though based on a heterogenous group of 10 patients with azoospermia, showed a fall in serum estradiol and a nonsignificant rise in testosterone [ll].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In their report, Smith et al demonstrated differential changes in the hormonal levels between the first and second year after vasectomy [15]. The higher level of testosterone in azoospermia obtained in the present study is in agreement with the results of Skegg et al, who reported a greater rise in testosterone levels 6 yr after vasectomy [14]. The studies by Purvis et al, though based on a heterogenous group of 10 patients with azoospermia, showed a fall in serum estradiol and a nonsignificant rise in testosterone [ll].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…One study, with the longest follow-up time (3 years) and largest sample, reported a statistically significant increase in the mean serum T levels of vasectomized men (Smith et al, 1979). Two case-control studies evaluated plasma T levels in non-vasectomized men and in men vasectomized from 1 to 5 years earlier (Varma et al, 1975;Skegg et al, 1976). Neither found statistically significant differences in T levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one of these studies, the number of non-vasectomized men used for comparison was small (n = 16) and may not have been adequate to demonstrate a difference (Varma et al, 1975). The second study compared 188 vasectomized men with 100 men scheduled for a vasectomy and found mean T levels that were about 10% higher in the vasectomy group (Skegg et al, 1976). None of these studies examined TeBG-bc levels or indices of free T.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Potential biological mechanisms supporting an association between vasectomy and incident prostate cancer include increases in androgen levels, which are hypothesised to increase the risk of prostate cancer,31 and impaired secretory function of the prostate, which might prolong exposure of the prostate to carcinogenic factors 11. Although some studies have shown an increase in serum dihydrotestosterone and testosterone after vasectomy,32 33 34 others have found no statistically significant change in androgen levels 3536 Similarly, findings on the association between frequency of ejaculation and risk of prostate cancer are conflicting 37…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%