2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) fillets biopreservation by using gallic acid and chitosan coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
9
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensory indicators of AA group also showed its whitish characteristics. Meanwhile, lower L* values were discovered in the AP + 1.0% CS group and the AP + 2.0% CS group, the results were discovered in the previous research for CS coating (Zarandona et al, 2021). Overall, the L* value was on the rise in back meat, while no significant difference was observed in belly meat ( p > .05).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The sensory indicators of AA group also showed its whitish characteristics. Meanwhile, lower L* values were discovered in the AP + 1.0% CS group and the AP + 2.0% CS group, the results were discovered in the previous research for CS coating (Zarandona et al, 2021). Overall, the L* value was on the rise in back meat, while no significant difference was observed in belly meat ( p > .05).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The initial count of Pseudomonas bacteria was 2.5log CFU/g (Figure 2b), which was consistent with the result of Zarandona et al (2021). At the beginning of storage, the count of psychrophilic bacteria and H 2 S-producing bacteria was 2.5logCFU/g and 2.8log-CFU/g, respectively (Figure 2c,d).…”
Section: Microbiological Analysissupporting
confidence: 85%
“…TVB-N in samples was measured with FOSS Kjeldahl analyzer (Kjeltec TM 2,300, FOSS Co, Shanghai, China) according to Deng et al (2019) with some modifications and expressed as mgN/100g. The TBARS value was detected according to the method suggested in Zarandona et al (2021) and it was expressed by mg MDA/100 g. The WHC of fish was evaluated as described in Otero et al(2019). The WHC value was expressed as a formula:…”
Section: Physicochemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, it was determined that uncoated fillets had higher microbial load during storage compared to coated samples. Similarly, Zarandona et al (2021) associated the high initial load of fresh fillets with an increase in mesophilic flora caused by contamination during the preparation and processing of fillets and emphasized that chitosan coatings slow down microbial growth in mackerel fillets and maintain the quality until the last day of storage. The antimicrobial effect of chitosan is mediated by interactions between positively charged chitosan and negatively charged microbial cell membranes, which induces leakage of cellular proteins and other intracellular components.…”
Section: Determination Of Free Amino Acid Content and Total Mesophilic Aerobic Bacteria Countmentioning
confidence: 99%