2013
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hospice Offers More Palliative Care but Costs Less Than Usual Care for Terminal Geriatric Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Nationwide Study

Abstract: HCC patients in hospice wards received more narcotic palliative care, underwent fewer aggressive procedures, and incurred lower costs than those in acute wards. Hospice care should be promoted as a viable option for terminally ill, elderly HCC patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, close monitoring is essential. Emotional and nutritional support is also important for terminal stage care, so collaboration between the hospice team and the clinical nutrition team would be helpful [167] . Until the final round, a multidisciplinary approach should be maintained.…”
Section: Terminal Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, close monitoring is essential. Emotional and nutritional support is also important for terminal stage care, so collaboration between the hospice team and the clinical nutrition team would be helpful [167] . Until the final round, a multidisciplinary approach should be maintained.…”
Section: Terminal Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…reported that in Taiwan hospice care for older adults with terminal HCC was associated with improved delivery of symptomatic medications, and was associated with reduced costs. 79 Similarly, a recent publication by Fukui et al . demonstrates lower hospitalization costs for Medicare beneficiaries with liver cancer who received hospice care.…”
Section: Palliative Care Can Be Helpful To Hcc Patients In Different mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Data of patients with terminal-stage cancer were first cut in the year of death and then cut for the second time according to the cancer diagnosis. The matching method required one-to-one matching in the same year of death, cancer diagnosis, and survival days with the nearest neighbor matching technique using the propensity score [7,32,33,38].…”
Section: Sample Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%