2022
DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hospital accreditation processes in Saudi Arabia: a thematic analysis of hospital staff experiences

Abstract: BackgroundHospital accreditation by an international organisation can play an important role in health quality and safety. However, little is known about how managers and front-line employees experience and perceive the effects of accreditation. Their views could inform quality improvement processes and procedures.ObjectiveTo explore perceptions of employees at the managerial level on the Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation process and its impact on quality of patient care in Saudi Arabian JCI-a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All healthcare professionals viewed the planning stage as a favorable aspect of JCI accreditation. However, their perceptions varied regarding implementing and sustaining post-accreditation changes 84 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All healthcare professionals viewed the planning stage as a favorable aspect of JCI accreditation. However, their perceptions varied regarding implementing and sustaining post-accreditation changes 84 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with healthcare professionals, the administrative staff was more satisfied with implementing JCI standards ( 7 ). Evidence indicated perceived benefits of pursuing and implementing JCI accreditation, such as improving the quality of training and education ( 8 ), building up quality improvement and patient safety culture ( 9 ), reducing variation in medical care ( 10 ), valuing the organizational change ( 5 ), and enhance hospital branding ( 11 ). However, there was no consensus among hospital managers about whether or not JCI accreditation had an enduring impact on the improvement ( 9 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence indicated perceived benefits of pursuing and implementing JCI accreditation, such as improving the quality of training and education ( 8 ), building up quality improvement and patient safety culture ( 9 ), reducing variation in medical care ( 10 ), valuing the organizational change ( 5 ), and enhance hospital branding ( 11 ). However, there was no consensus among hospital managers about whether or not JCI accreditation had an enduring impact on the improvement ( 9 ). Side effects of implementing JCI standards were perceived, such as the preparation of JCI distracted healthcare workers from daily clinical work ( 8 ), requiring substantial monetary resources ( 10 ), and being time-consuming ( 11 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When planning for accreditation, institutions need to incorporate strategies to ensure that improvements to care continue after the accreditation period. (Al Mansour et al, 2022). The accreditation model is comprehensive and has been implemented to improve the quality of services and patients' safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%