Hospital accreditation, reimbursement and case mix: links and insights for contractual systems

Abstract

BackgroundResource consumption is a widely used proxy for severity of illness, and is often measured through a case-mix index (CMI) based on Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs), which is commonly linked to payment. For countries that do not have DRGs it has been suggested to use CMIs derived from International Classification of Diseases (ICD). Our research objective was to use ICD-derived case-mix to evaluate whether or not the current accreditation-based hospital reimbursement system in Lebanon is appropriate.MethodsOur study population included medical admissions to 122 hospitals contracted with the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) between June 2011 and May 2012. Applying ICD-derived CMI on principal diagnosis cost (CMI-ICDC) using weighing similar to that used in Medicare DRG CMI, analyses were made by hospital accreditation, ownership and size. We examined two measures of 30-day re-admission rate. Further analysis was done to examine correlation between principal diagnosis CMI and surgical procedure cost CMI (CMI-CPTC), and three proxy measures on surgical complexity, case complexity and surgical proportion.ResultsHospitals belonging to the highest accreditation category had a higher CMI than others, but no difference was found in CMI among the three other categories. Private hospitals had a higher CMI than public hospitals, and those more than 100 beds had a higher CMI than smaller hospitals. Re-admissions rates were higher in accreditation category C hospitals than category D hospitals. CMI-ICDC was fairly correlated with CMI-CPTC, and somehow correlated with the proposed proxies.ConclusionsOur results indicate that the current link between accreditation and reimbursement rate is not appropriate, and leads to unfairness and inefficiency in the system. Some proxy measures are correlated with case-mix but are not good substitutes for it. Policy implications of our findings propose the necessity for changing the current reimbursement system by including case mix and outcome indicators in addition to accreditation in hospital contracting. Proxies developed may be used to detect miss-use and provider adverse behavior. Research using ICD-derived case mix is limited and our findings may be useful to inform similar initiatives and other limited-setting countries in the region.

Health system resilience: Lebanon and the Syrian refugee crisis

“…During the crisis, the participation of the private sector and civil society, and networking with different donors, international stakeholders and UN agencies was not only important for health system governance but also for the development of multi-sectoral health strategies. Examples of successful partnerships included the engagement of the primary health care national network and private hospitals in health care delivery to mount a unified and effective response [37].…”

Growing Pains at Hospitals: Opportunities and Issues of Service Expansion in Maximum Care

“…Qualitative service expansion could not be ascertained: the ASA classifications, which might indicate a change in case complexity, have not significantly changed as well as the CMI, which is often wrongly used for measuring complexity (36, 37). CMI is the total of the relative value for each patient case charged by a hospital in a certain period (effective case mix) divided by the number of cases.…”

The Design of Performance Monitoring Systems in Healthcare Organizations : A Stakeholder Perspective

“…Hence, this evolution has sustained the promotion of the traditional MCS within healthcare. To meet the accreditation standards, the Lebanese hospitals promote their internal policies and their managerial tools to preserve their public arrangements and their main sources of funds (Ammar, et al 2013). …”