2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-015-4634-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host-feeding pattern of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in heterogeneous landscapes of South Andaman, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India

Abstract: Mosquito foraging behavior is a determinant of host-vector contact and has an impact on the risk of arboviral epidemics. Therefore, blood-feeding patterns is a useful tool for assessing the role in pathogen transmission by vector mosquitoes. Competent vectors of dengue and chikungunya viz. Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus are widely prevalent in the Andaman and Nicobar archipelago. Considering the vector potential, medical importance of both these mosquito species and lack of information on host-feeding patt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
45
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…albopictus can be anthropophagic, especially in urban environments. Humans are often the primary host, followed by domesticated mammals . In the United States, Singapore, Thailand, metropolitan Barcelona, and suburban Cameroon, Ae.…”
Section: Arbovirus Transmission In a Changing Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…albopictus can be anthropophagic, especially in urban environments. Humans are often the primary host, followed by domesticated mammals . In the United States, Singapore, Thailand, metropolitan Barcelona, and suburban Cameroon, Ae.…”
Section: Arbovirus Transmission In a Changing Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locations and references for subsp. aegypti (top row): Hawaii, USA [42]; Florida, USA [43], Pate, Kenya [44], Andaman/Nicobar Islands [45]; rural Thailand [46, 47]. References for subsp.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…albopictus must bite humans at least 40% of the time. The Asian tiger mosquito's vectorial capacity is persistently questioned because the propensity for biting humans versus other vertebrates varies widely, as the species appears to opportunistically bite the most available vertebrates [19,20,26,[28][29][30][34][35][36][37]. We show that while a higher probability of human host-use is associated with greater R 0 , increasing the proportion of bites from humans above 40% increased potential for local transmission and resulting human disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies demonstrate that propensity for human biting by Ae. albopictus across its invasive range varies widely and that the species appears to opportunistically bite whatever birds or mammals most readily available [18,20,26,28,30,34,35,71], although some studies indicate a human preference [37]. We assumed that of the total number of mosquito bites per day a certain proportion, P h , are on humans and 1-P h are on alternate hosts.…”
Section: Ethics Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation