2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2010.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hostile takeover or joint venture: Connections between institutional theory and sport management research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
137
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the data capture a 53 year time frame. Second, it provides another example of how organizational theories (like institutional theory) can shed light on the strategic and competitive issues underlying a sports organization's competitive environment (Fort and Maxcy, 2003;Washington and Patterson, 2011). In this case, institutional theory has provided some perspective on the motivations underlying the pursuit of competitive balance by the NFL, mainly, that the presence of competitive balance serves as a uniting force among the independently-owned NFL sports organizations as they attempt to compete with the various entertainment choices available to their current and potential fans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this case, the data capture a 53 year time frame. Second, it provides another example of how organizational theories (like institutional theory) can shed light on the strategic and competitive issues underlying a sports organization's competitive environment (Fort and Maxcy, 2003;Washington and Patterson, 2011). In this case, institutional theory has provided some perspective on the motivations underlying the pursuit of competitive balance by the NFL, mainly, that the presence of competitive balance serves as a uniting force among the independently-owned NFL sports organizations as they attempt to compete with the various entertainment choices available to their current and potential fans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the current study, institutional theory helps to explain the motivations behind enacting policies that can create competitive balance. Further, if the policies function as intended, the current study may begin to speak to Washington and Patterson's (2011) call for more research on both how different sports leagues evolve over time and why some sports (like the NFL) have remained in a dominant position over time (Hoovers, 2012, Miller, 2012, Easterbrook, 2012, Fendich, 2012.…”
Section: The Thrill Of Sports Entertainmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the analytic processing stage involves constituents classifying organizations (e.g., professional basketball organization; nonprofit CSO) as a basis to make sense of their actions. In turn, this allows constituents to evaluate organizational practices in relation to a set of myths that apply to all organizations in a classification (Meyer & Rowan, 1977;Santomier, 1979;Soebbing & Mason, 2009;Suchman, 1995;Washington & Patterson, 2011;Zucker, 1987).…”
Section: Perceived Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have drawn upon a raft of theoretical perspectives and concepts in order to understand and explain the nature and extent of change evident within amateur sport organizations. These include, but are not limited to, commercialization (e.g., Slack, 2004), professionalization (e.g., Thibault, Slack, & Hinings, 1991;Macintosh, Bedecki, & Franks, 1987;Macintosh & Whitson, 1990), and organizational and institutional theory (e.g., O'Brien & Slack, 2003Kikulis, Slack, & Hinings, 1992;Washington & Patterson, 2011). Sport policy scholars have also drawn upon a number of meso-level theoretical concepts to explain organizational and systemic change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%