“…But the photophysical processes of these two types of materials are different, − mainly because the organic semiconductors have a much larger exciton binding energy ( E b ), even by orders of magnitude, than the inorganic semiconductors. − E b is defined as the energy difference between a bound electron–hole pair (exciton) and a free electron–hole pair . In the solar cells based on inorganic semiconductors, Wannier-type excitons are usually formed upon illumination, which are able to spontaneously dissociate into free electrons and holes, benefitting from the small E b that is usually smaller than the thermal energy k B T at room temperature. , On the contrary, due to the substantially large E b of organic semiconductors, tightly bound Frenkel-type excitons are predominantly generated in the organic solar cells (OSCs) upon photoexcitation, and they are difficult to separate into free charges to produce photocurrent. , Therefore, in actual OSC devices, two different organic semiconductor materials, featuring electron-donating (donor, D) and electron-accepting (acceptor, A) properties, were introduced in the active layer. They can form a heterojunction, and their energy-level difference at the interface serves as the driving force for charge transfer (CT) to overcome the exciton binding energies, generating free electrons (charge carriers) in the acceptor phase and holes (charge carriers) in the donor phase. − However, the introduction of this driving force inevitably leads to additional energy loss and lowers open-circuit voltage ( V OC ) in the OSCs. − Although the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the single-junction OSCs with the highest performance has exceeded 19%, it still lags far behind the inorganic solar cells.…”