2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-019-04500-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hot Deformation Behavior of LA43M Mg-Li Alloy via Hot Compression Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated value was lower than those of the rolled single α-phase Mg–Li alloy (211 kJ/mol) [ 24 ], as-cast LAZ532 (160 kJ/mol) [ 3 ], commercial AZ80 alloy (216 kJ/mol) [ 36 ], extruded-state α(Mg)–β(Li) duplex phase Mg–Li alloy (148 kJ/mol) [ 37 ], as-cast Mg–2 Zn–0.3 Zr–0.9 Y alloy (236.2 kJ/mol) [ 38 ], and as-cast Mg–3 Sn–Ca alloy (236 kJ/mol) [ 39 ]. Despite being related to the other Mg–Li alloys with α + β duplex phases or a single β -phase, the deformation activation energy in the presented work was higher than those of the as-cast α + β alloy (127 kJ/mol) [ 40 ], the as-cast single β -phase Mg–Li alloy (95 kJ/mol) [ 41 ], the as-cast Mg–8 Li–3 Al–2 Zn alloy modified with Zr (108 kJ/mol) [ 8 ], the as-cast Mg–9 Li–1 Zn alloy (127 kJ/mol) [ 42 ], the as-cast Mg–11.5 Li–1.5 Al alloy (95 kJ/mol) [ 43 ], the as-cast Mg–3 Sn–2 Al–1 Zn–5 Li (139 kJ/mol) [ 44 , 45 ], the as-cast Mg–9 Li–3 Al alloy with Sr addition (110 kJ/mol) [ 46 ], and as-cast LA43M (110 kJ/mol) [ 4 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The calculated value was lower than those of the rolled single α-phase Mg–Li alloy (211 kJ/mol) [ 24 ], as-cast LAZ532 (160 kJ/mol) [ 3 ], commercial AZ80 alloy (216 kJ/mol) [ 36 ], extruded-state α(Mg)–β(Li) duplex phase Mg–Li alloy (148 kJ/mol) [ 37 ], as-cast Mg–2 Zn–0.3 Zr–0.9 Y alloy (236.2 kJ/mol) [ 38 ], and as-cast Mg–3 Sn–Ca alloy (236 kJ/mol) [ 39 ]. Despite being related to the other Mg–Li alloys with α + β duplex phases or a single β -phase, the deformation activation energy in the presented work was higher than those of the as-cast α + β alloy (127 kJ/mol) [ 40 ], the as-cast single β -phase Mg–Li alloy (95 kJ/mol) [ 41 ], the as-cast Mg–8 Li–3 Al–2 Zn alloy modified with Zr (108 kJ/mol) [ 8 ], the as-cast Mg–9 Li–1 Zn alloy (127 kJ/mol) [ 42 ], the as-cast Mg–11.5 Li–1.5 Al alloy (95 kJ/mol) [ 43 ], the as-cast Mg–3 Sn–2 Al–1 Zn–5 Li (139 kJ/mol) [ 44 , 45 ], the as-cast Mg–9 Li–3 Al alloy with Sr addition (110 kJ/mol) [ 46 ], and as-cast LA43M (110 kJ/mol) [ 4 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compressive hot deformation study of as-cast LA43M alloy [ 4 ] provides information about similar regions in the processing maps, which are indicative of high-power dissipation capability. To confirm this interpretation for the three high-efficiency zones determined on the processing maps of the analyzed ultralight Mg–Li alloy, microstructural observations were carried out.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to the binary phase diagram of the Mg-Li alloy, there are three types of structures with different lithium contents, which are α-Mg phase (less than 5.7 wt% Li), β-Li phase (more than 10.3 wt% Li), and duplex (α-Mg+β-Li phase) structures between 5.7 wt% and 10.3 wt% Li. When the content of lithium is less than 5.7%, the HCP structural Mg-Li alloy has lower c/a, thus improving the deformation ability at room temperature [9][10][11]. Unfortunately, the applications of Mg-Li alloys are limited due to their low strength and poor corrosion resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%