2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0031719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hot-electron photocurrent detection of near-infrared light based on ZnO

Abstract: We demonstrate an unconventional near-infrared photodetector fabricated from a ZnO chip with a metallic subwavelength grating structure as a contact and optical window, which harvests hot electrons generated by plasmonic resonances introduced by incident light. The grating structure has a strong selection of the polarization of incident light, meaning that the detector is naturally polarization-sensitive. In our device, the polarization extinction ratio is as high as 64:1, much higher than that relying on crys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By combining the antennas with a semiconducting material, these hot carriers will contribute to a photocurrent via the internal photoeffect (IPE). This approach has been used for photodetectors with a broadband response in the visible (VIS) and near infrared (NIR) regime [6,24,28], independent of the bandgap of the used semiconductor (SC), while the resonant behavior of plasmonic nanoantennas has allowed to selectively enhance the detection of a defined wavelength range, which can be tuned via the antenna geometry [12,9,16]. Moreover electronic responsivity switching [28] and polarization detection [9,16] have been reported for plasmonic IPE detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By combining the antennas with a semiconducting material, these hot carriers will contribute to a photocurrent via the internal photoeffect (IPE). This approach has been used for photodetectors with a broadband response in the visible (VIS) and near infrared (NIR) regime [6,24,28], independent of the bandgap of the used semiconductor (SC), while the resonant behavior of plasmonic nanoantennas has allowed to selectively enhance the detection of a defined wavelength range, which can be tuned via the antenna geometry [12,9,16]. Moreover electronic responsivity switching [28] and polarization detection [9,16] have been reported for plasmonic IPE detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been used for photodetectors with a broadband response in the visible (VIS) and near infrared (NIR) regime [6,24,28], independent of the bandgap of the used semiconductor (SC), while the resonant behavior of plasmonic nanoantennas has allowed to selectively enhance the detection of a defined wavelength range, which can be tuned via the antenna geometry [12,9,16]. Moreover electronic responsivity switching [28] and polarization detection [9,16] have been reported for plasmonic IPE detectors. However, to achieve reasonable photocurrents, large arrays of nanostructures had to be used so far [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining the antennas with a semiconducting material, these hot carriers will contribute to a photocurrent via the internal photoeffect (IPE). This approach has been used for photodetectors with a broadband response in the visible (VIS) and near-infrared (NIR) regime, independent of the bandgap of the used semiconductor (SC), while the resonant behavior of plasmonic nanoantennas has allowed selective enhancement of the detection of a defined wavelength range, which can be tuned via the antenna geometry. Moreover electronic responsivity switching and polarization detection , have been reported for plasmonic IPE detectors. However, to achieve reasonable photocurrents, large arrays of nanostructures had to be used so far …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%