2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

House prices, consumption and the role of non-Mortgage debt

Abstract: This paper examines the relationship between house prices and consumption, through the use of debt. Using unique Canadian household-level data that reports the uses of debt, we begin by looking at the relationship between house prices and debt. Using quantile regression, we find a positive and significant relationship between regional house prices and total household debt all along the conditional debt distribution. This suggests that the household-level relationship between house prices and debt goes beyond t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in line with Sousa (2008), who provides empirical support that consumption is sensitive to household debt. It also confirms the empirical results of Kartashova and Tomlin (2017) who find that a significant percent of homeowners' non-mortgage debt is used for non-housing consumption.…”
Section: [Insert Table 1 Here]supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is in line with Sousa (2008), who provides empirical support that consumption is sensitive to household debt. It also confirms the empirical results of Kartashova and Tomlin (2017) who find that a significant percent of homeowners' non-mortgage debt is used for non-housing consumption.…”
Section: [Insert Table 1 Here]supporting
confidence: 87%
“…We show that the elasticity of housing wealth is higher than the corresponding elasticity with respect to financial assets, a finding similar with various studies (Barrell et al, 2015;Marquez et al, 2013;Carroll et al, 2011;Dreger and Reimers, 2012;Case et al, 2005;Catte et al, 2004;Ludwig and Slok, 2004;Barata and Pacheco, 2003). We also provide evidence that the consumption elasticity of household debt is statistically significant with a positive effect, indicating that households use part of their liabilities for consumption reasons in line with the empirical results of Kartashova and Tomlin (2017), Bunn and Rostom (2014) and Mian and Sufi (2016).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We show that the elasticity of housing wealth is higher than the corresponding elasticity with respect to financial assets, a finding similar with various studies (Barrell et al, 2015;Marquez et al, 2013;Carroll et al, 2011;Dreger and Reimers, 2012;Case et al, 2005;Catte et al, 2004;Ludwig and Slok, 2004;Barata and Pacheco, 2003). We also provide evidence that the consumption elasticity of household debt is statistically significant with a positive effect, indicating that households use part of their liabilities for consumption reasons in line with the empirical results of Kartashova and Tomlin (2017), Bunn and Rostom (2014) and Mian and Sufi (2016).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Therefore, as mortgage debt increases, so does credit card debt. Other evidence indicates a positive correlation between a mortgage or home equity and credit card consumption/debt (Mann 2009;Mian and Sufi 2011;Kartashova and Tomlin 2017). Mian and Sufi (2011) find that households with higher credit card utilization rates increase their debt more strongly in response to increases in home equity.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%