House Search Duration in Hot and Cold Residential Markets

Abstract

This study analyzes the determinants of house search duration of consumption‐driven buyers and individual investors in different housing market environments. We use data from surveys of recent house‐buyers in “hot” and “cold” housing markets in the 2000s housing bubble in California characterized by rising and declining residential house prices, respectively. The average house price and the surveyed geographical area are the same for both periods. Expected house ownership horizon is shown to be an important determinant of the realized search duration in addition to commonly considered housing and buyer characteristics. We find a statistically significant positive effect of it on the time until purchase in both housing price environments for consumption‐driven buyers. We also find that consumption‐driven house purchases were highly pronounced in coastal areas in the hot market and inland areas in the cold market. In contrast, long‐horizon investment activity leads that of consumption activity in those areas. Short‐horizon investors, on the other hand, concentrated their house search activity in inland areas in both housing market environments.

To accept or not to accept: Optimal strategy for sellers in real estate

“…Recent studies by Rutherford, Springer, and Yavas (2005); Rutherford, Springer, and Yavas (2007), Levitt and Syverson (2008) and Xie (2018) provide empirical evidence to support the claims of agency problems by showing that properties that are owned by agents sell for higher prices than properties owned by clients. Another set of studies recognize that real estate markets are cyclical and examine the house search process in hot (rising) versus cold (declining) markets (Chernobai & Hossain, 2012; Dale‐Johnson & Hamilton, 1998; Li & Yavas, 2014; Ngai & Tenreyro, 2014).…”

After the crisis is before the crisis: Reading property market shifts through Amsterdam’s changing landscape of property investors

“…Third, ownership composition refers to the organisational characteristics of the investment company or the investment fund. Existing literature outside of the wider urban studies links ownership composition to a variety of behaviours, such as opportunistic behaviour, growth pattern, debt structure, risk aversion strategy, institutional culture, and so forth (Brunnermeier and Julliard, 2008; Chernobai and Hossain, 2012; Goldstein, 2018; Mills et al, 2019). As our previous systematic literature review revealed, economics literature, and particularly real estate economics and finance articles, emphasise investment behaviour, while urban studies and geography literature largely neglects this aspect, and it was entirely absent in urban and regional planning articles (Özogul and Taşan-Kok, 2020).…”

Willingness or Market Power: What Induces Tenants to Pay for Energy Efficient Housing?

“…Hyland et al (2013) identify that price effects for energy efficiency change under different selling conditions: Under financial constraints, price effects for energy-efficient apartments increase because these apartments provide less financial risks, such as upcoming refurbishment costs or future rising energy costs. There are different indicators describing housing market conditions including local rent increases, absolute rent burdens of households, construction activity, and vacancy rates (Chernobai and Hossain, 2012;Krainer, 2001;Novy-Marx, 2009). Since reliable data for construction activity and vacancy rates can hardly be obtained on postal code level, we use the average rental price increase as an indicator for market conditions.…”