2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-011-9960-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Household and Context Determinants of Child Labor in 221 Districts of 18 Developing Countries

Abstract: We develop a new theoretical framework that explains the engagement in child labor of children in developing countries. This framework distinguishes three levels (household, district and nation) and three groups of explanatory variables: Resources, Structure and Culture. Each of the three groups refers to another strand of the literature; economics, sociology and anthropology. The framework is tested by applying multilevel analysis on data for 239,120 children living in 221 districts of 18 developing countries… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0
15

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(51 reference statements)
4
37
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Water scarcity affects this role in a significant way. Women and young girls primarily have the task of fetching water in developing countries [19]. In Africa, 90% of the wood gathering and water collection is done by women [20].…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water scarcity affects this role in a significant way. Women and young girls primarily have the task of fetching water in developing countries [19]. In Africa, 90% of the wood gathering and water collection is done by women [20].…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These causes of initiation and continuation of child labor are related to economic factors, as well as to social and cultural factors. Regarding the causes of child labor, Webbink, Smits, and de Jong (2011) propose a comprehensive model of different levels. For these authors, the causes of child labor can be (a) the resources related to family income, the job or the education of the parents, (b) the structural characteristics, such as the number of brothers or family members, the availability of educational resources, and the level of urbanization, and (c) the culture as it relates to the existing values and norms associated with child labor.…”
Section: Main Causes Of Child Labormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children with more siblings might be less engaged in household chores. In other words, more siblings might also mean more helping hands, which allows for a division of tasks at home (Webbink, Smits, & de Jong, 2013). The marginal effect of household non-food expenditure is -0.0178, which means that each additional 1 per cent increase in non-food expenditure reduces the probability of engaging in household chores by 0.02 percentage points.…”
Section: Estimates Of Marginal Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, there is no significant effect for children participating in economic activities in rural areas. It shows that participation of children in economic 5 Previous studies show that in most developing countries girls are more likely than boys to do chores with the perception that it will teach them special skills and prepare them for adult life (Webbink et al, 2013;Zapata et al, 2011). activities responds less to the programme in rural than in urban areas.…”
Section: Robustness Checks Based On Gender and Residencementioning
confidence: 99%