1982
DOI: 10.2307/143511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Housing Affordability and Spatial Price Variations in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the finding that housing price levels in the U.S. are most satisfactorily predicted by the level of solar radiation (Stutz and Kartman 1982) does not identify the causal process that lies between this measure of environmental amenity and the housing market: the correlation might be spurious. For example, the finding that housing price levels in the U.S. are most satisfactorily predicted by the level of solar radiation (Stutz and Kartman 1982) does not identify the causal process that lies between this measure of environmental amenity and the housing market: the correlation might be spurious.…”
Section: Conclusion: Empirical and Theoretical Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the finding that housing price levels in the U.S. are most satisfactorily predicted by the level of solar radiation (Stutz and Kartman 1982) does not identify the causal process that lies between this measure of environmental amenity and the housing market: the correlation might be spurious. For example, the finding that housing price levels in the U.S. are most satisfactorily predicted by the level of solar radiation (Stutz and Kartman 1982) does not identify the causal process that lies between this measure of environmental amenity and the housing market: the correlation might be spurious.…”
Section: Conclusion: Empirical and Theoretical Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…determination. For example, the finding that housing price levels in the U.S. are most satisfactorily predicted by the level of solar radiation (Stutz and Kartman 1982) does not identify the causal process that lies between this measure of environmental amenity and the housing market: the correlation might be spurious. There is at least one line of reasoning that might tie an office-based economy with urban amenity.…”
Section: Conclusion: Empirical and Theoretical Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have been shown in recent studies to be adversely affecting the life chances of urban blacks, particularly those residing in the nations' largest metropolitan communities (Brinkley-Carter 1979;Wilson 1978Wilson , 1987Farley and Allen 1987;Sampson 1987;Braddock and McPartland 1987;Lichter 1988). These macrolevel forces include: structural shifts in metropolitan economies (Bluestone and Harrison 1982;Scott 1988;Kasarda 1989), the entry of large numbers of women and disadvantaged immigrants into the metropolitan labor market-the so-called "labor surplus" hypothesis (Levy 1987), and the housing aff ordability crisis and other newly emerging constraints in the metropolitan housing market in the post-I970 period (Stutz and Kartman 1982;Adams 1988). The second perspective should focus in greater detail, perhaps via the use of social surveys, on demographic and economic forces operating at the micro-or individual household level.…”
Section: The Spatial Pattern Of Outmigration From Losmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He argued that these forces are what drives the house price changes and are not relatively due to population growth rates and construction costs. In the context of this paper, when younger working households has the tendency to 'leave the nest' means there is greater demand of housing (Stutz and Kartman, 1982). The opportunist of the housing market who is either investors or speculators will send the house price upwards due to this increasing demand from younger households.…”
Section: House Pricementioning
confidence: 95%
“…House price plays an important role in housing affordability. Price is considered to be the most reliable index of housing market (Stutz and Kartman, 1982). Due to this important factor, it merits special attention especially in housing studies.…”
Section: House Pricementioning
confidence: 99%