Housing Collateral and the Monetary Transmission Mechanism

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. The Working Paper series presents reports on matters in the sphere of activities of the Riksbank that are considered to be of interest to a wider public. The papers are to be regarded as reports on ongoing studies and the authors will be pleased to receive comments. Terms of use: Documents inThe views expressed in Working Papers are solely the responsibility of the authors and should not to be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Executive Board of Sveriges Riksbank. Housing collateral and the monetary transmission mechanismKarl Walentin and Peter Sellin y Sveriges Riksbank Working Paper No. 239April 2010 AbstractIn this paper our main aim is to quantify the role that housing collateral plays for the monetary transmission mechanism. Furthermore, we want to explore the implications of the increase in household indebtedness, and speci…cally the loan-to-value ratio, in the last two decades. We set up a two sector DSGE model with production of goods and housing. Households can only borrow by using their houses as collateral. The structure of the model closely follows Iacoviello and Neri (2010). To be able to do quantitatively relevant exercises we estimate the model using Bayesian methods on Swedish data for 1986q1-2008q3. We quantify the reinforcement of the monetary transmission mechanism that housing used as collateral implies in the presence of nominal loan contracts. This mechanism functions through the e¤ects of the interest rate on house prices as well as on in ‡ation and thereby the real value of nominal debt. This component of the monetary transmission mechanism becomes stronger the higher the loan-to-value ratio is. A change in the maximum loan-to-value ratio from 85% to 95%, all else being equal, implies that the e¤ect of a monetary policy shock is increased by 4% for in ‡ation, 8% for GDP and 24% for consumption. We conclude that to properly understand the monetary transmission mechanism and its changing nature over time, we need to take into account the e¤ects of housing related collateral constraints.

Effects of Monetary and Macroprudential Policies on Financial Conditions: Evidence from the United States

“…Jorda et al (2015) find that a 100 basis point increase in the policy rate reduces mortgage loans by about 3 percent after 4 years, and has a significant, although smaller, impact on property prices. Walentin (2014) finds that a 100 basis point shock reduces real property prices by 4.5 percent after 14 quarters, while Laseen et al (2015) find that a similar shock lowers house prices by about 2 percent. Jorda et al (2015) show that a similar monetary policy shock decreases the house-prices to income ratio by about 4 percent after 4 years.…”

Housing Price and Household Debt Interactions in Sweden

“…With credit deregulation, mortgage lending increased substantially and house prices boomed but the economy slid into recession shortly after and uncertainty brought a radical decline in housing demand (Barot and Takala, 1998). Englund, Hendershott, and Turner (1995) find that the following house price collapse was 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Multi-dwellings One-or-two dwellings Share of multi-dwellings, right 1990199219941996199820002002200420102014 Tenant owned Share of rented, right exacerbated by the tax reform in 1991, which sharply reduced the after-tax return on housing investments -also confirmed by the analysis in section V of contributions by real after tax mortgages rates to house price developments. 8 After the boom-bust cycle ended in the early 90s, household debt to disposable income increased substantially, almost doubling over 20 years and exceeding the average for OECD countries (Figure 8).…”

Debt Dynamics and Monetary Policy: A Note

“…Assuming constant house price growth, g > 0, 12 along with a constant housing stock normalised to unity, H t = 1, a constant LTV ratio for new mortgage loans, t = and no amortisations, = 0, this simpli…es to…”