How a Laser Physics Induced Kerr-Newman Black Hole Can Release Gravitational Waves without Igniting the Black Hole Bomb (Explosion of a Mini Black Hole in a Laboratory)

Abstract

Note, that micro black holes last within micro seconds, and that we wish to ascertain how to build, in a laboratory, a black hole, which may exist say at least up to 10^−1 seconds and provide a test bed as to early universe gravitational theories. First of all, it would be to determine, if the mini black hole bomb, would spontaneously occur, unless the Kerr-Newmann black hole were carefully engineered in the laboratory. Specifically, we state that this paper is modeling the creation of an actual Kerr Newman black hole via laser physics, or possibly by other means. We initiate a model of an induced Kerr-Newman black Holes, with specific angular momentum J, and then from there model was to what would happen as to an effective charge, Q, creating an E and B field, commensurate with the release of GWs. The idea is that using a frame of reference trick, plus E + i B = −function of the derivative of a complex valued scalar field, as given by Appell, in 1887, and reviewed by Whittaker and Watson, 1927 of their "A Course of Modern Analysis" tome that a first principle identification of a B field, commensurate with increase of thermal temperature, T, so as to have artificially induced GW production. This is compared in part with the Park 1955 paper of a spinning rod, producing GW, with the proviso that both the spinning rod paper, and this artificial Kerr-Newman Black hole will employ the idea of lasers in implementation of their respective GW radiation. The idea is in part partly similar to an idea the author discussed with Dr. Robert Baker, in 2016 with the difference that a B field would be generated and linked to effects linked with induced spin to the Kerr-Newman Black hole. We close with some observations about the "black holes have no hair" theorem, and our problem. Citing some recent How to cite this paper: Beckwith, A.W.

How a Kerr-Newman Black Hole Leads to Criteria about If Gravity Is Quantum Due to Questions on If (Δ<i>t</i>)<sup>5</sup> + <i>A</i><sub>1</sub> ⋅ (Δ<i>t</i>)<sup>2</sup> + <i>A</i><sub>2</sub> = 0 Is Solvable

“…This requires [14] and it is not clear that this is actually obtainable, in the experimental set up as given in our [6] Aside from having a negative temperature, as for the reason given in Equation (5) we have that if [14] is satisfied and still commensurate with reference [14] that we also need to have a polynomial in delta t, which is commensurate with Equation (6) which is taken from the abstract in [5] and is linkable to Equation (5).…”

“…Secondly our Equation (5) terms have to be consistently comparable to Equation (6). This requires rescaling of Equation (5) but this is doable pending dimensional analysis, and perhaps Planckian physics units.…”

“…Whereas, we will confine ourselves to utilizing an interval of time, t ∆ as being affected by the production of gravitons, of a numerical counting value of n, whereas this is then linked to entropy, by the infinite quantum statistics argument of Ng [8], so that. t ∆ has a functional dependence upon the number of gravitons, n, in msasurements, as alluded to in [6].…”

“…What we are doing is accessing instead results from Galois theory, as to Quintics, 0 t A t A ∆ + ⋅ ∆ + = will be derived as an extension of the discussion given by the author in [6] as to an induced Kerr-Newman black hole. As to future developments, this has a tie into [7] as to the Riemann Zeta function and Riemann P function, which may be tied into this documents developments in a later discussion.…”

“…In a nutshell, we will be formally deriving ( ) ( ) 0 t A t A ∆ + ⋅ ∆ + = is a polynomial in a form given in [5] that indeed, since n will be in terms of a graviton count from a black hole given in [6], that then we have a necessary condition for quantum gravity, at least in the framework of aligning ( ) ( ) given in [5] which are allegedly exactly solvable. If ( ) ( ) 5 2 1 2 0 t A t A ∆ + ⋅ ∆ + = does not meet the conditions given in [5], then we say that the criteria for exact sol-Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology vability of an expression for t ∆ have not been met, and that indeed, then we have at best a semi classical treatment of gravity for reason which we will discuss at the end of our manuscript.…”