1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(199907)10:1<72::aid-jmri10>3.3.co;2-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How accurate are measurements on MRI? a study on multiple sclerosis using reliable 3D stereological methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overestimation was worse for POP with higher amounts of CS (2 g/L and 3 g/L) because the signal intensity increases as more contrast agent is used. This results in overprojection of the section thickness, i.e., more voxels light up at the boundary of the object [38]. Silicone gel diameter was underestimated in MRI in both the x and y directions, and polyurethane diameter was underestimated in the y direction but overestimated in the x direction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The overestimation was worse for POP with higher amounts of CS (2 g/L and 3 g/L) because the signal intensity increases as more contrast agent is used. This results in overprojection of the section thickness, i.e., more voxels light up at the boundary of the object [38]. Silicone gel diameter was underestimated in MRI in both the x and y directions, and polyurethane diameter was underestimated in the y direction but overestimated in the x direction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Correspondingly, only 11 out of 50 imaging studies found reduced whole brain volume in schizophrenia (Shenton et al, 2001); however, all 11 of the positive studies were based upon chronic patients, while 10 of the negative studies were based upon subjects in their first episode of schizophrenia. In addition, it is not clear to what degree the inconsistency of the MRI findings reflects methodological limitations; assessments of accuracy of MRI-based volume estimates suggest that significant biases may be present (Gadeberg et al, 1999(Gadeberg et al, , 2002Garcia-Fiñana et al, 2003). Assuming it exists, this small difference could to some degree be caused by medication effects like the one observed in this study; however, it appears that a medication-induced difference in whole brain size of a magnitude comparable to the B10% seen in our study does not occur, in general, in individuals with schizophrenia treated with antipsychotic drugs.…”
Section: Implication For Studies Of Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, PVE increases if the object analyzed is very irregular in shape (21). Other studies have reported an overestimation of 10% or more when volume of different objects are measured using imaging modalities (19,20). We did not experience influences of PVE in the acquired images, which may be explained by the fact that the kidney is regular in shape, quite large, and acquisitions were performed using thin slices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This would potentially result in an overestimation of Vc. Gadeberg et al (19) showed that the impact of PVE depends on the slice thickness and the diameter of the object investigated; hence, the thinner the slices and the larger the diameter, the smaller the PVE (19,20). Furthermore, PVE increases if the object analyzed is very irregular in shape (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%