1998
DOI: 10.1559/152304098782594616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How and Why Community Groups Use Maps and Geographic Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
70
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation methodology proposed can be defined as a type of Multicriteria Spatial Decision Analysis (MCSDA) due to its ability to (i) contribute to the construction of databases with a suitable amount of information, exploiting the potential of Geographical Information Sciences (GISciences) [26], databases that can be consulted and easily updated, linked to the national infrastructure system (these systems have been developed since the 1990s [27][28][29][30][31] and have expanded enormously in the past 20 years [12,[32][33][34] thanks also to their integration with World Wide Web (WWW) technologies [35]); (ii) participate in the formation of TIS territorial information systems regarding the network of minor airports, such as those for the organization and consultation of data supporting decisions; (iii) combine geographic data (map criteria) with assessment indicators (decision-makers' preference and uncertainties) in order to collect information that will prove suitable and useful when making decisions [36].…”
Section: The Framework Of Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation methodology proposed can be defined as a type of Multicriteria Spatial Decision Analysis (MCSDA) due to its ability to (i) contribute to the construction of databases with a suitable amount of information, exploiting the potential of Geographical Information Sciences (GISciences) [26], databases that can be consulted and easily updated, linked to the national infrastructure system (these systems have been developed since the 1990s [27][28][29][30][31] and have expanded enormously in the past 20 years [12,[32][33][34] thanks also to their integration with World Wide Web (WWW) technologies [35]); (ii) participate in the formation of TIS territorial information systems regarding the network of minor airports, such as those for the organization and consultation of data supporting decisions; (iii) combine geographic data (map criteria) with assessment indicators (decision-makers' preference and uncertainties) in order to collect information that will prove suitable and useful when making decisions [36].…”
Section: The Framework Of Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of critical GIS, for instance, has long concerned itself with the fact that digital representations of places are rarely equitable or genuinely participatory (see Pickles 1995). Sarah Elwood (2006) has noted that little has changed for those at the bottom of the digital divide and financial and skill barriers continue to influence who gets a say in digital representations of the world and who does not (see also Craig and Elwood 1998). More recently, work has shown how user-generated digital content such as Wikipedia not just largely represents the Global North, but is also overwhelmingly produced by users in the Global North (Graham et.…”
Section: "Until the Lion Learns How To Write Every Story Will Glorifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of PPGIS/PGIS The rapid development of PPGIS/PGIS has raised many questions regarding the strengths and limitations of the methods that require systematic evaluation (Sieber, 2006;Craig & Elwood, 1998). In the early stages of development, scholars focused more effort on evaluating PPGIS/PGIS tools and technology than participatory outcomes or the quality of the spatial data.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%