U n c o r r e c t e d P r o o fA. Spink and M. Zimmer (eds.) Summary This chapter investigates the 'winner-takes-all' hypothesis in relation to how academic researchers access online sources and resources. Some have argued that the Web provides access to a wider range of sources of information than offline resources. Others, such as Hindman et al. (2003), have shown that access to online resources is highly concentrated, particularly because of how Internet search engines are designed. With researchers increasingly using the Web and Internet search engines to disseminate and locate information and expertise, the question of whether the use of online resources enhances or diminishes the range of available sources of expertise is bound to become more pressing. To address this question four globally relevant knowledge domains were investigated using large-scale link analysis and a series of semi-structured interviews with UK-based academic researchers.We found there to be no uniform 'winner-takes-all' effect in the use of online resources. Instead, there were different types of information gatekeepers for the four domains we examined and for the types of resources and sources that are sought. Particular characteristics of a knowledge domain's information environment appear to determine whether Google and other Internet search engines function as a facilitator in accessing expertise or as an influential gatekeeper.
IntroductionIt is widely believed that the rapid diffusion of the Internet and the Web has transformed knowledge and expertise by widening access and making information available globally. Whilst there has been an exponential increase in the production and use of networked digital resources, little is known about the reach and impact of this form of distributed knowledge. Some have argued that information technology could have a 'democratizing' impact on knowledge and information (Dahl 1989), others have argued the opposite: that in the online world these resources have in fact become concentrated in a 'winner-takes-all' effect (Hindman et al. 2003), due in part to the link-based indexing algorithms of search engines and how such tools are embedded in information seeking practices. There is thus a need to Spink_Ch14.indd 255 Spink_Ch14.indd 255