How artificial intelligence might change academic library work: Applying the competencies literature and the theory of the professions

Abstract

The probable impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on work, including professional work, is contested, but it is unlikely to leave them untouched. The purpose of this conceptual paper is to consider the likelihood of the adoption of different approaches to AI in academic libraries. As theoretical lenses to guide the analysis the paper draws on both the library and information science (LIS) literature on librarians' competencies and the notions of jurisdiction and hybrid logics drawn from the sociological theory of the professions. The paper starts by outlining these theories and then reviews the nature of AI and the range of its potential uses in academic libraries. The main focus of the paper is on the application of AI to knowledge discovery. Eleven different potential approaches libraries might adopt to such AI applications are analyzed and their likelihood evaluated. Then it is considered how a range of internal and external factors might influence the adoption of AI. In addition to reflecting on the possible impact of AI on librarianship the paper contributes to understanding how to synthesize the competencies literature with the theory of the profession and presents a new understanding of librarians as hybrid.

ChatGPTand a new academic reality:Artificial Intelligence‐writtenresearch papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing

“…Similarly, the need to ensure compliance with copyright laws and proper attribution is a concern that is relevant to any situation in which AI and chatbots are used to incorporate third‐party materials (Hristov, 2016). The impact of AI and chatbots on traditional citation practices and the evaluation of research is also a concern that is applicable to these technologies as a whole (Cox, 2022). As AI and chatbots become more prevalent, it is important to consider the potential implications for traditional practices and to ensure that the value placed on human expertise is appropriately balanced with the use of these technologies.…”

The Lawyering Toolkit: a supportive tool to close the legal literacy gap between learners and practice professionals – a proof-of-concept report

“…We need to consider content, learning checks, further testing of the platform and possible migration, sustainable development and open access considerations. Our plans for future action include user testing, accessibility, UDL compliance, a possible tab for librarian CPD and future-proofing access to the platform across academic and practice libraries and the challenge of how AI (Cox, 2023; Cox and Tzoc, 2023; Talley, 2016) will impact future research practice.…”

Information technology and changing role models in German libraries: The example of OPEN‐CAM

“…It is an important task for libraries, or special libraries, to preserve this old knowledge and make it accessible. Moreover, it might be the task of the future for medical libraries to apply modern digital methods such as artificial intelligence (Cox, 2023) to this corpus of knowledge. Finally, to answer the question: ‘Will technology kill the healthcare library?’ (Rashbass, 2000): It will rather transform than kill it.…”