2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Can Inequalities in Mortality Be Reduced? A Quantitative Analysis of 6 Risk Factors in 21 European Populations

Abstract: BackgroundSocioeconomic inequalities in mortality are one of the greatest challenges for health policy in all European countries, but the potential for reducing these inequalities is unclear. We therefore quantified the impact of equalizing the distribution of six risk factors for mortality: smoking, overweight, lack of physical exercise, lack of social participation, low income, and economic inactivity.MethodsWe collected and harmonized data on mortality and risk factors by educational level for 21 European p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite reduced mortality in all educational groups, educational inequality in mortality increased in Norway in the period 1960–2000 [ 9 ]. Smoking is one mechanism behind this inequality [ 10 ]. Increased knowledge about social inequality in smoking behaviour can inform tobacco prevention efforts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite reduced mortality in all educational groups, educational inequality in mortality increased in Norway in the period 1960–2000 [ 9 ]. Smoking is one mechanism behind this inequality [ 10 ]. Increased knowledge about social inequality in smoking behaviour can inform tobacco prevention efforts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to inform policy deliberations in the field, we will, where possible, report outcomes according to the comprehensiveness and/or degree of coverage of the intervention (eg, type of environment covered for smoke-free legislation, degree of tobacco tax increase, stop-smoking medicines being free vs low-cost), in subgroup analyses. Furthermore, given the large and increasing global disparities in smoking and smoking-related health outcomes, 26 27 and the evidence of differential impact of various tobacco control policies on these disparities, 11 15 27 28 we will, where possible, report the impact of each intervention according to socioeconomic status, alongside describing its overall impact. In an attempt to further minimise potential residual confounding by active smoking among children, we will, where relevant, reanalyse the data after exclusion of studies with active smoking rates >10% in the study population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health-promoting behaviour in all social groups (30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37) Bad health habits are more common in groups with a low social status Differences in health behaviour stem from unnecessary and unfair differences in social, economic and environmental living conditions. Today, most ill health in high-income countries such as Norway is caused by non-communicable diseases, and the risk factors for these disease groups are largely linked to unfavourable behaviours such as smoking, unhealthy diets, sedentary lifestyles, alcohol and drug use.…”
Section: Recommended Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%