How can project orientation contribute to pro-environmental behavior in private organizations in Slovakia

Sustainable artificial intelligence: A corporate culture perspective

“…transparency" form a core value of companies with a sustainability-oriented corporate culture (Caputo et al 2017) as well as a central principle within ethical AI (Jobin et al 2019). As values are shared through interaction (Marsina et al 2019), corporate culture should foster interaction between designers and users of SAI through which values aligned with the concept of sustainable development can manifest.…”

“…We refer to the sustainable behavior of a company as an umbrella term for habits, actions, or processes (Chen 2011;Chang 2015;Marsina et al 2019) that positively contribute to the sustainability performance of a company. As the targeted use of SAI requires a contribution to the SDGs, the realization of SAI forms a sustainable behavior.…”

“…After companies have formalized their acceptance of this moral obligation within sustainability norms (with a specific reference to AI use), they can derive and implement sustainability standards (Upstill-Goddard et al 2016). Accordingly, in visualizing cultural determinants (e.g., pro-environmental values, green ethics), sustainability standards make these determinants observable (Marsina et al 2019), providing members of the company with a standard they can refer to when assessing whether the use of AI is realized in the sense of SAI. Furthermore, subjective or personal as well as (perceived) social norms and the normative institutional environment influence sustainable behaviors (e.g., Banwo and Du 2019) (cf.…”

Knowledge, Competences and Competitive Advantage of the Green-Technology Companies in Poland

“…Following this framework indicating the importance of time-and context-specific analyses, several contributions have been made by various authors, describing the aspects of knowledge and competences of green companies in the case of the following countries: China [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], Australia [15], Brazil [16], Canada [17], Finland [18], Germany [19,20], India [21,22], Japan [23], Malaysia [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], Pakistan [32][33][34][35][36][37], Romania [38], Slovakia [39], Asian-Pacific area (including Taiwan, South Korea, China, Hong Kong, India) [40] and European countries (including France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom as one group) [41]. This study attempts to follow this framework and build on the research findings related to the knowledge and competences of companies (from the perspective of resource-based theory) [42][43][44] and knowledge management in organizations [45][46][47] (especially since the survival of companies largely depends on significant investments in knowledge manage...…”

“…This study attempts to follow this framework and build on the research findings related to the knowledge and competences of companies (from the perspective of resource-based theory) [42][43][44] and knowledge management in organizations [45][46][47] (especially since the survival of companies largely depends on significant investments in knowledge management [48]). Although important contributions tackling the characteristics of green-technology companies based outside of the Central and Eastern European (CEE) region have been made, there are only a few describing CEE companies-e.g., [39]. Studies concerning Poland with a specific focus on green technology suppliers and their knowledge and competences are still rare [49].…”