2021
DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30542-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How COVID-19 has fundamentally changed clinical research in global health

Abstract: Summary COVID-19 has had negative repercussions on the entire global population. Despite there being a common goal that should have unified resources and efforts, there have been an overwhelmingly large number of clinical trials that have been registered that are of questionable methodological quality. As the final paper of this Series, we discuss how the medical research community has responded to COVID-19. We recognise the incredible pressure that this pandemic has put on researchers, regulators, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
137
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
137
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Undertaking smarter trials requires a thorough consideration of multiple candidate designs during the planning stage, ideally with the use of statistical simulations to weigh the efficiencies of different designs. Further discussion of adaptive trial designs and case studies are provided in the second 44 and fourth 45 papers of this Series.…”
Section: Current Landscape Of Trial Research In Global Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undertaking smarter trials requires a thorough consideration of multiple candidate designs during the planning stage, ideally with the use of statistical simulations to weigh the efficiencies of different designs. Further discussion of adaptive trial designs and case studies are provided in the second 44 and fourth 45 papers of this Series.…”
Section: Current Landscape Of Trial Research In Global Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to continuous evaluation of UPMC internal analyses and controlled clinical trials, the COVID-19 Therapeutics Committee has evaluated the surge of COVID-19-related preprints and peer-reviewed publications that have emanated on an unprecedented scale throughout the pandemic. 24,25,26 This placed a premium on expertise in evaluating the merits of published information. While our committee recognized the benefits of and thus implemented steroids, remdesivir, and tocilizumab in selected COVID-19 patients, it refuted use of hydroxychloroquine despite its EUA, given the existing data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fast-track development also raised several concerns on regulation and incentives related to clinical trials as well as R&D and vaccine security [4] , calling for intense collaboration [6] . So, it is urgent to discuss alternative models for vaccine R&D and production to guarantee equitable access in the current and future pandemics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%