How Culture and Economy Meet inSouthKorea: The Politics of Cultural Economy in Culture‐led Urban Regeneration

Abstract

This article investigates the ways in which cultural economy is formed through negotiation and interaction between local actors in the case of culture‐led regeneration in Gwangju, South Korea. It looks at the dynamics between the bureaucrats' pursuit of economic growth in the city and the efforts of civil society to maintain a strong political spirit throughout the regeneration process. Through in‐depth interviews with various participants and archival analysis, the politics of cultural economy are examined in relation to the Gwangju Biennale and the City of Culture project. The findings show that in these two cases bureaucrats were the dominant force, a tendency that instrumentalized culture. They also illustrate that this dominance brought about resistance from civil society. However, in the process of both engaging in conflict and working with each other, the different discourses of economic growth and cultural meaning were integrated, and in the process mutual learning and adaptation took place among members of the two groups. Civil society also faced cleavages resulting from different approaches to how to collaborate with the bureaucrats and its ensuing self‐reflection on communicative value enhanced its rehabilitation. The article argues that the politics of cultural economy is dynamic, involving processes of renegotiation, adaptation and self‐realization. It also offers the possibility of a new arena for the public sphere. Civil society plays a critical role in the integration of culture and economy.

Creative Cluster Evolution: The Case of the Film and TV Industries in Seoul, South Korea

“…The development of the Korean film and broadcasting industries reveals that their significant growth cannot be explained without considering the role of the government in supporting them (Keane, 2006;Kwon & Kim, 2013). In order to understand the current film and TV industries in Korea, it is important to look at the institutional settings and the interactions taking place among different public sectors and individual participants, as well as the discourses articulated by diverse agencies (Shin & Stevens, 2013). Private sector firms in the film and broadcasting industries have been assisted by governments in raising capital.…”

Vida sociopolítica em mercados culturais na cidade de Porto Alegre

“…Há também experiências de associações de profissionais da cultura que participariam em projetos de desenvolvimento urbano e em processos de construção de mercados (Shin & Stevens, 2013;Trigo, 2015;Ulldemolins & Jiménez, 2015). Segundo Ulldemolins e Jiménez (2015), profissionais da cultura teriam sido capazes de induzir a cooperação de comunidades com o propósito de influir em projetos de regeneração urbana baseados na implantação de grandes instituições culturais, nas cidades de Barcelona, na Espanha, e de Cartagena das Índias, na Colômbia.…”

“…O que se tem, nos dados de entrevistas e nas informações disponíveis em sites da Internet, sobre as associações em estudo são tendências de mudanças que, por diferentes caminhos, visam à ampliação de seus respectivos mercados, como já observado em outros estudos (Shin & Stevens, 2013;Trigo, 2015). Um caminho tem sido a aposta nos ganhos de qualidade e na capacidade de oferecer novidade por meio da formação acadêmica e profissional e do reconhecimento dos contornos do trabalho do designer.…”

Balancing gentrification in the knowledge economy: the case of Chattanooga’s innovation district

“…The development of innovation districts is also criticized for being non-participative and undemocratic in which local governments are pushing a neoliberal agenda favoring the middle and upper classes (Moulaert 2000;Shin and Stevens 2013;Swyngedouw, Moulaert, and Rodriguez 2002). This paper contributes to the literature on gentrification studies, innovation districts, and knowledge-based urban development (KBUD) by providing policy responses and strategies to better distribute the benefits when pursuing place-based, knowledge-based urban redevelopments.…”