2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2022.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How did the COVID-19 Pandemic Affect Pediatric Neurologists?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, 39 studies were unable to be retrieved, 3 were duplicates, 75 lacked a clear outcome definition (eg, a validated questionnaire was not used) or had the wrong outcome, 111 were not original articles (eg, comments, letters, and reviews), 2 were not in English, and 70 included mixed populations (eg, health care workers without separate data reported for physicians). In total, 57 studies satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study (Table 1), involving a total of 28 965 physicians . Fifty-five studies (96.4%) were cross-sectional while 2 (3.5%) were longitudinal .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Of these, 39 studies were unable to be retrieved, 3 were duplicates, 75 lacked a clear outcome definition (eg, a validated questionnaire was not used) or had the wrong outcome, 111 were not original articles (eg, comments, letters, and reviews), 2 were not in English, and 70 included mixed populations (eg, health care workers without separate data reported for physicians). In total, 57 studies satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study (Table 1), involving a total of 28 965 physicians . Fifty-five studies (96.4%) were cross-sectional while 2 (3.5%) were longitudinal .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 57 studies satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study (Table 1), involving a total of 28 965 physicians . Fifty-five studies (96.4%) were cross-sectional while 2 (3.5%) were longitudinal . Thirty-three (57.8%) studies provided a response rate with a mean of 47.5% (median, 50%; range, 4.7%-96.2%) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations