How do associative and phonemic overlap interact to boost illusory recollection?

Hutchison, Keith A.; Meade, Michelle L.; Williams, Nikolas; Manley, Krista D.; McNabb, Jaimie

doi:10.1080/09658211.2017.1393091

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In further tests in English, Hutchison et al (2018) found that adding a single item that shared the initial phonemes with a CI to eight associates in studied lists resulted in a significant boost in false recall and specifically in false remember responses to recalled CIs. This is consistent with models of spoken word recognition that suggest that initial phoneme information is important in narrowing a pool of potential neighbors during word recognition, such as the cohort model (Marslen-Wilson and Tyler, 1980).…”

Section: Manipulations Of Structural Similarity: Phonological and Orthographic Listsmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…Research using the DRM paradigm can inform researchers on the interactions between visual word recognition and memory processes, which are often examined separately (e.g., Westbury et al, 2002;Cortese et al, 2008;Hutchison et al, 2018). Specifically, this paradigm can be used to test predictions of word recognition models and results suggest some long-term maintenance or persistence of verbatim information.…”

Section: Manipulations Of Structural Similarity: Phonological and Orthographic Listsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Manipulations of List Type in the DRM Paradigm: A Review of How Structural and Conceptual Similarity Affect False Memory

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of list-learning paradigms to explore false memory has revealed several critical findings about the contributions of similarity and relatedness in memory phenomena more broadly. Characterizing the nature of “similarity and relatedness” can inform researchers about factors contributing to memory distortions and about the underlying associative and semantic networks that support veridical memory. Similarity can be defined in terms of semantic properties (e.g., shared conceptual and taxonomic features), lexical/associative properties (e.g., shared connections in associative networks), or structural properties (e.g., shared orthographic or phonological features). By manipulating the type of list and its relationship to a non-studied critical item, we review the effects of these types of similarity on veridical and false memory. All forms of similarity reviewed here result in reliable error rates and the effects on veridical memory are variable. The results across a variety of paradigms and tests provide partial support for a number of theoretical explanations of false memory phenomena, but none of the theories readily account for all results.

show abstract

Section: Manipulations Of Structural Similarity: Phonological and Orthographic Listsmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Manipulations Of Structural Similarity: Phonological and Orthographic Listsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Manipulations of List Type in the DRM Paradigm: A Review of How Structural and Conceptual Similarity Affect False Memory

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Empirical support for the interactive model has been shown in semantically mediated phonological priming, homophone processing [6][7][8] , and false memory studies [9][10][11][12] . In semantically mediated phonological priming studies, it was shown that participants were quicker to respond to targets following primes that were indirectly phonologically related 6,7 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 94%

“…These studies show higher false memories in these hybrid lists compared to pure lists of either kind 10 . Recently, such higher false memories to hybrid lists have been argued to be related to the interactive model 11 . According to this theory, this effect is due to additive activation in both semantic and phonological networks related to the critical lure, allowing this activation to surpass a threshold for output 11 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Unveiling the nature of interaction between semantics and phonology in lexical access based on multilayer networks

Levy

Kenett

Oxenberg

et al. 2021

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An essential aspect of human communication is the ability to access and retrieve information from ones’ ‘mental lexicon’. This lexical access activates phonological and semantic components of concepts, yet the question whether and how these two components relate to each other remains widely debated. We harness tools from network science to construct a large-scale linguistic multilayer network comprising of phonological and semantic layers. We find that the links in the two layers are highly similar to each other and that adding information from one layer to the other increases efficiency by decreasing the network overall distances, but specifically affecting shorter distances. Finally, we show how a multilayer architecture demonstrates the highest efficiency, and how this efficiency relates to weak semantic relations between cue words in the network. Thus, investigating the interaction between the layers and the unique benefit of a linguistic multilayer architecture allows us to quantify theoretical cognitive models of lexical access.

show abstract

“…Other studies have reported that lists comprising semantic and phonological associates result in additive false memories (Finley et al, 2017;Hutchison et al, 2018;McBride et al, 2019;Watson et al, 2003). Watson et al (2003) presented hybrid lists with semantic (e.g., hound, puppy) and phonological associates (e.g., log, dot), related to one critical item (e.g., DOG), in a single list.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

False Memory Facilitation Through Semantic Overlap

Suzuki

2023

Experimental Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigated the effects of semantic overlap from multiple sources on false memories. Participants were presented with paired study lists comprising items highly associated with one nonstudied critical item. There were three types of list pairs: (1) the sharing condition, in which the words in both lists were classified into different semantic groups that converged on the same critical word (semantic overlap), (2) the repetition condition, in which the two lists comprised identical words, and (3) the single condition, in which the paired lists were attributed to different semantic groups that did not share a critical item. In Experiment 1, participants were presented with the paired study lists and responded to free recall tests and a recognition test including remember-know judgments. In Experiment 2, the participants responded to a recognition test, and the participants in Experiment 3 recalled the studied items. The results indicated that the false recall and false recognition rates in the sharing condition were higher than those in the repetition and single conditions. These results suggest that activation from multiple independent sources may have an accumulative additive effect. The findings are discussed in relation to the Activation-Monitoring theory.

show abstract

How do associative and phonemic overlap interact to boost illusory recollection?

Cited by 5 publications

References 27 publications

Manipulations of List Type in the DRM Paradigm: A Review of How Structural and Conceptual Similarity Affect False Memory

Manipulations of List Type in the DRM Paradigm: A Review of How Structural and Conceptual Similarity Affect False Memory

Unveiling the nature of interaction between semantics and phonology in lexical access based on multilayer networks

False Memory Facilitation Through Semantic Overlap

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About