How Do English L1 Learners of Advanced Japanese Infer Unknown Kanji Words in Authentic Texts?

Abstract

This study investigates advanced Japanese language learners' abilities to infer unknown kanji (Chinese character) words while reading authentic Japanese texts. Data obtained from 42 English L1 students indicate that, first, although they can guess the meanings of unknown kanji words in context, they frequently make erroneous guesses or fail to guess at all. Second, the more proficient students can use context better than the less proficient students. Third, when reading comprehension ability is controlled, there is no difference in kanji inferencing ability between heritage language (HL) learners and non-HL learners. Fourth, when the students can pronounce the given semantically unknown kanji words fully or partially while reading, such phonological knowledge proved to be related to successful inferencing. I would like to thank the associate editor and anonymous reviewers of

Digital Game-based Learning (DGBL) in the L2 Classroom: The Impact of the UN’s Off-the-Shelf Videogame, Food Force, on Learner Affect and Vocabulary Retention

“…How DGBLL can be deployed both in and outside of the classroom to teach specific linguistic features in L2 development may be of interest to future L2 researchers. Further, the Japanese writing system presents a special challenge to students, as its orthographic systems are difficult to master for many learners (e.g., Kondo-Brown, 2006). How effectively DGBLL can be employed to overcome this challenge would be an interesting and pertinent research area in Japanese language research.…”

The Impact of Flipped Online Kanji Instruction on Written Vocabulary Learning for Introductory and Intermediate Japanese Language Students

“…Other studies have consistently demonstrated that the use of multiple sources of information leads to better learning than reliance on a single source of information (Mori, , ; Shen, ). Available strategies include compositional analysis (Jackson, Everson, & Ke, ; Kubota & Toyoda, ; Mori, ; Mori et al, ; Shen & Ke, , Toyoda, ; Yamashita & Maru, ), context‐based strategies (Kondo‐Brown, ; Mori, , Mori & Nagy, ; Taniuchi & Komori, ; Yamagata, ), mnemonic strategies (Kuo & Hooper, ; Kuwabara, ; Rose, ; Soemer & Schwan, ; Toyoda & McNamara, ; Verhaeghen, Palfai, & Johnson, ), and repeated writing (Butler, ; Gamage, , Nesbitt, ; Thomas, , ; Winke, ). The pedagogical implication is that L2 students should be encouraged to use multiple strategies flexibly and effectively in an enriched, multimodal learning environment, as the ability to use metacognitive strategies can be improved through strategy instruction (Ulambayar, ).…”

Review of recent research (2000–2010) on learning and instruction with specific reference to L2 Japanese

“…As a result, issues in L2 kanji include kanji learning/teaching strategies (Shimizu & Green, 2002;, memory and retrieval (Chikamatsu 2005), radical/compositional awareness (Toyoda 2000;Yamashita & Maru 2000;Kubota & Toyoda 2001;Mori, Sato & Shimizu 2007), the role of contextual and morphological information in interpreting novel kanji words (Y. Mori , 2003Kondo-Brown 2006a;, the transferability of L1 knowledge among learners with Chinese-character backgrounds (Kato 2005;Sawabe & Yasui 2008), the role of teacher feedback in learning to write kanji characters (Kubota 2005), and teacher/student perceptions of kanji teaching/learning (Y. Shimizu & Green 2002;Gamage 2003;Grainger 2005;.…”

“…Similarly, L2 students are able to use information from component characters to infer the meanings of novel kanji compounds (Y. Mori , 2003aKondo-Brown 2006a;.…”

“…Consequently, L2 students often misinterpret unfamiliar words (Y. or fail to work out their meaning (Kondo-Brown 2006a). Students should therefore be encouraged to use multiple sources of information in interpreting novel kanji words (Y.…”