‘How do I choose?’: mathematics teachers’ sensemaking about pedagogical responsibility

The tools related to mathematics teachers’ pedagogical reasoning: critical review

“…The literatures were identified by exploring Scopus database with keywords "pedagogical reasoning" or "curricular reasoning" or "instructional reasoning" or "practical reasoning" or "reflective reasoning" or "reasoning * teaching" or "reasoning * learning" or reasoning * student" AND "mathematics" or "mathematical" AND "teacher". The total of 30 articles were located, through the selection process, the 13 articles (Andrews-Larson, Wilson, & Larbi-Cherif, 2017;Arani, 2017;Aydogan Yenmez, Erbas, Cakiroglu, Cetinkaya, & Alacaci, 2018;Baldinger, 2020;Chen, Marshall, & Horn, 2020;Choy, 2016;Dyer & Sherin, 2016;Horn, 2010;Kim, Metzger, & Heaton, 2019;Lesseig et al, 2017;McDuffie & Mather, 2009;Niess & Gillow-Wiles, 2017;Von Minden, Walls, & Nardi, 1998) were included in this review study.…”

“…Lastly, the videos are used after implementation process. Usually, video is employed as an object in teachers collaboration time (Arani, 2017;Chen et al, 2020;Dyer & Sherin, 2016;Lesseig et al, 2017), which offer opportunities for teachers to discuss, reflect and evaluate the teaching and learning process on the videos.…”

Kompetensi Guru dalam Pengajaran Konsep Matematik: Kajian Literatur Bersistematik

“…Kaiser et al, 2019;Refugio et al, 2020;Yang et al, 2018Yang et al, , 2021Trung Tran et al, 2020;Huda & Pardimin, 2018;Kuzu & Arican, 2020;Maire et al, 2021, Weiland et al, 2019Stephen Norton, 2019;Matiash et al, 2020;Christiansen & Erixon, 2021;Blomeke et al, 2020;Caroline et al, 2019;Davrajoo & Letchumanan, 2019;Schiepe-Tiska, 2019;Retnawati et al, 2018;Jehana M. Darkis, 2020;Baier et al 2019;Kusumawati et al, 2020). Selain itu, terdapat 16 kajian melibatkan analisis kualitatif (Chen et al, 2021;Alsina & Mula, 2019;Choy & Dindyal, 2018;Gómez-Blancarte et al, 2019;Larrain & Kaiser, 2019;Tupas, 2019;Mesut Ozturk, 2021;Beswick & Fraser, 2019;Ramos Rodriques et al, 2021;Depaepe et al, 2020;Marufi et al, 2020;Kim How et al, 2021;Grace et al, 2020;Sadykova et al, 2021;Jita et al, 2019), dan selebihnya terdapat 2 yang melibatkan kaedah campuran (Mamsi & Herbert, 2020;Aguirre et al, 2021) bagi memastikan ianya munasabah, tepat dan berguna.…”

“…Berdasarkan 42 artikel yang telah dipilih, kesemuanya telah menyatakan bahawa faktor pedagogi merupakan antara faktor yang mempengaruhi kepada kompetensi guru. Faktor Terdapat 23 sekolah menengah yang telah membuat kajian berdasarkan kompetensi pedagogi (Chen et al, 2021;Itgel Miyejav, 2018;Choy & Dindyal, 2018;Neto et al, 2020;Podkhodova et al, 2020;Aguirre et al, 2021;Refugio et al, 2019;Beswick & Fraser, 2019;Marufi et al, 2020;Yang et al, 2021;Kim How et al, 2021;Grace et al, 2020;Huda & Pardimim, 2018;Kuzu & Arican, 2020;Stephen Norton, 2019;Sadykova, et al, 2021;Blomeke et al, 2020;Caroline et al, 2019;Davrajoo & Letchumanan, 2019;Schiepe-Tiska, 2019;Jita et al, 2019;Retnawati et al, 2018;Baier et al, 2019). Bagi peringkat sekolah rendah, hanya terdapat 4 kajian sahaja yang dijalankan iaitu dari Belanda (Oonk et al, 2020), Afrika Selatan (Mamsi & Herbert, 2020) dan Filipina (Refugio et al, 2020;Jehana M. Darkis, 2020).…”

Pedagogical love in Finland and Australia: a study of refugee children and their teachers

“…Pedagogical debate has explored love as one of the positive emotions connected to the teaching profession (Chen 2016); a factor counteracting unfavourable external conditions in teaching (Choi and Tang 2009); as a disposition framing a teacher's work, including conceptual and practical aspects deriving from love (Yin et al 2020) or simply, the very essence of 'good teaching' (Chen, Marshall, and Horn 2020) and 'good pedagogy' (Halpin 2009). These explorations use terms, sometimes interchangeably, such as pedagogical love (Loreman 2011;Uusiautti 2013a, 2013b); pedagogy of love (Zembylas 2017); or loving pedagogy (Halpin 2009;Yin et al 2020).…”