How Do Land Takings Affect Political Trust in Rural China?

Abstract

While China's ruling Communist Party has benefited from a reservoir of political trust engendered by more than three decades of rapid economic growth, it is confronted with rising social tensions and the prospect of instability. The number of mass incidents, which is a key measure of instability, has risen enormously, and a major source of such incidents stems from local governments taking land from farmers, often at below‐market prices. This article draws upon data from two surveys to assess the political trust implications of land takings. It is found that, as expected, land takings are associated with a decline in political trust. However, the decline affects trust in local authorities only and leaves the central government largely unscathed. Nonetheless, the gap between villagers' trust in central and local authorities is not unalloyed good news for the regime and has major implications for policy implementation and governance.

The impact of economic well-being on perceptions of anti-corruption performance: Evidence from China

“…Male respondents appear to be less satisfied with the government's anti-corruption work. This is in line with some scholarly analysis of China's situation where, due to labor allocation between men and women in the family, women tend to take care of the family affairs, while men interact more frequently with the government (Cui, Tao, Warner, & Yang, 2014). The situation may be different in other countries (Dollar, Fisman, & Gatti, 2001;Frank, Lambsdorff, & Boehm, 2011;Swamy, Knack, Lee, & Azfar, 2001), but a detailed discussion of the issue is beyond this study because gender is a control variable in our analysis.…”

Infrastructure Spending in China Increases Trust in Local Government

“…Land grabbing in China is considered to have a big impact on trust in government, particularly in rural areas (Cui et al 2015). Therefore, if there had been a slowdown in land grabbing, it could have perhaps provided an alternative explanation to the increase in trust in local government.…”

Following the Money: Corruption, Conflict, and the Winners and Losers of Suburban Land Acquisition in China

“…Much research has concluded that these deep entanglements of interests and villagers' lack of trust in local officials and developers are likely to induce further social unrest events (Yu, 2005;van Rooij, 2007;So, 2007;Ho, 2014;Zhou and Banik, 2014). These range from the small scale, such as 'nail households' or individual households that resist forced eviction despite the commencement of neighbourhood destruction, to larger events, such as expulsions, casualties, or even colony incidents (Lin, 2010;Cui et al, 2014). Conflict caused by land acquisition constitutes a large proportion of social complaints in China and is the greatest cause of rural unrest (Zhu and Roy, 2007;Chen, 2015).…”