ICC 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2019.8761330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Do Non-Ideal UAV Antennas Affect Air-to-Ground Communications?

Abstract: Analysis of the performance of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-enabled communications systems often relies upon idealized antenna characteristic, where the side-lobe gain of UAVs' antenna is ignored. In practice, however, side-lobe cause inevitable interference to the ground users. We investigate the impact of UAVs' antenna side-lobe on the performance of UAVenabled communication. Our analysis shows that even for a very small antenna's side-lobe gain, the ground receiver can experience substantial interference. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vertical angel between the receiver k and the UAV-BS is ρ k = tan −1 (H/ X k ). The receiver k is within the main-lobe of the antenna, if [16]. The probability that the channel between UAV-BS and the receiver is in LOS status is obtained from p…”
Section: A Radio Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vertical angel between the receiver k and the UAV-BS is ρ k = tan −1 (H/ X k ). The receiver k is within the main-lobe of the antenna, if [16]. The probability that the channel between UAV-BS and the receiver is in LOS status is obtained from p…”
Section: A Radio Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vertical angel between the receiver and the UAV is . The receiver is within the mainlobe of UAV , if , or equivalently for [15]. The probability that the channel between UAV and the receiver is in LOS status is obtained from [16], where and are the channel parameters representing the characteristics of the communication environment.…”
Section: Monitored Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%