2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2021.101225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do team workloads and team staffing affect the audit? Archival evidence from U.S. audits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even considering a balanced team workload with fairly distributed tasks among team members, such workload may change due to team members' errors (Mazur et al, 2014;Sexton et al, 2000), low quality (Christensen et al, 2021), or by causes beyond team members' control (Porter et al, 2010), such as suppliers' issues, machinery breakdown, or significant changes in clients' orders or company procedures. When one or both situations occur, team members will use team's latitude to assess how to proceed.…”
Section: The Moderating Effect Of Team Structural Conditions On the Relationships Between Individual Demands And Resources And Individualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even considering a balanced team workload with fairly distributed tasks among team members, such workload may change due to team members' errors (Mazur et al, 2014;Sexton et al, 2000), low quality (Christensen et al, 2021), or by causes beyond team members' control (Porter et al, 2010), such as suppliers' issues, machinery breakdown, or significant changes in clients' orders or company procedures. When one or both situations occur, team members will use team's latitude to assess how to proceed.…”
Section: The Moderating Effect Of Team Structural Conditions On the Relationships Between Individual Demands And Resources And Individualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… We considered all studies that examine determinants of the receipt of a comment letter without limiting their analysis to specific types of comments, and we selected these five because each provides a unique perspective on the probability model. Other studies typically rely on one or more of the five papers we report in Table 1 for motivating their determinants (Asthana 2017; Blackburne et al 2019; Christensen et al 2021; Czerney et al 2019; Dyreng et al 2020; He et al 2020; Hribar et al 2014; Lawrence et al 2018; Nam and Thompson 2020). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of them is that the job desk given is not following the level of education and skills possessed by the Examiner. This resulted in the need for adjustments for the Examiner to be able to complete the tasks given (Werther & Davis, 2004;Christensen et al, 2021;Hockey, 1997).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%