2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2022.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do the recognizability and driving styles of automated vehicles affect human drivers’ gap acceptance at T- Intersections?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coexistence and interaction of AVs and HVs was investigated as well in [50], through a field test conducted on 18 participants, focusing on gap acceptance, car-following, and overtaking behaviors, showing that drivers interacting with recognizable AVs adopt smaller critical gaps, and after overtaking, merge closer in front of those. The work in [51] is devoted to understanding HVs behavior in mixed traffic at un-signaled priority T-intersections, through a driving simulator experiment on 95 human drivers, whose findings suggest that human drivers change their gap acceptance behavior in mixed traffic depending on AVs recognizability and driving style. Finally, the authors of [52] aimed at quantifying the behavioral changes caused by human drivers following either an AV or an HV, and their impact on safety, fuel consumption and pollution, by analyzing data from a field experiment on 9 drivers.…”
Section: A Avs-hvs Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coexistence and interaction of AVs and HVs was investigated as well in [50], through a field test conducted on 18 participants, focusing on gap acceptance, car-following, and overtaking behaviors, showing that drivers interacting with recognizable AVs adopt smaller critical gaps, and after overtaking, merge closer in front of those. The work in [51] is devoted to understanding HVs behavior in mixed traffic at un-signaled priority T-intersections, through a driving simulator experiment on 95 human drivers, whose findings suggest that human drivers change their gap acceptance behavior in mixed traffic depending on AVs recognizability and driving style. Finally, the authors of [52] aimed at quantifying the behavioral changes caused by human drivers following either an AV or an HV, and their impact on safety, fuel consumption and pollution, by analyzing data from a field experiment on 9 drivers.…”
Section: A Avs-hvs Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the afternoon, the probability of 18 veh/m is 0.18. This study is important to evaluate the density behavior throughout survey as it can be used in simulation models [39][40][41]. The stochastic fundamental diagram is based on speed-density data [42].…”
Section: Parameter Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%