2004
DOI: 10.1080/1354060042000243024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do we think? Teachers in education colleges reflect on the thinking in their respective disciplines: science and literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to develop a propensity for intertextual thinking, an atmosphere of legitimizing associative thinking must be created. A study conducted among literature teachers in teacher training colleges in Israel revealed that most of them do not see connectiveness as a very important literary skill (Greensfeld & Elkad-Lehman, 2004). Improving intertextual aptitude is contingent upon changing this attitude.…”
Section: Legitimizing Associative Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to develop a propensity for intertextual thinking, an atmosphere of legitimizing associative thinking must be created. A study conducted among literature teachers in teacher training colleges in Israel revealed that most of them do not see connectiveness as a very important literary skill (Greensfeld & Elkad-Lehman, 2004). Improving intertextual aptitude is contingent upon changing this attitude.…”
Section: Legitimizing Associative Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no single answer. The question also addresses a further issue -whether the discipline affects ways of thinking or thinking skills, or whether they are discipline dependent (Greensfeld & Elkad-Lehman, 2004;Perkins & Salomon, 1989). Despite the successes of teaching thinking on its own, without subject-matter context such as in applying De Bono's approach in the CORT method (De Bono, 1973), the main shortcoming of teaching thinking is the transfer of new knowledge to additional areas (Perkins, 1992;Perkins & Swartz, 1992).…”
Section: Developing Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same issues arise from the fact that the students viewed all the teachers similarly, and that teachers described their own behaviours in the same terms, despite the divergence of outcomes and classroom actions. Again, many others have commented on the difference between teachers' beliefs and behaviours (Greensfeld and Elkad-Lehman, 2004;, noting the challenge of accurately articulating practice and of enacting beliefs and principles . There may also be some lack of self-awareness: novices, be they students or teachers, may lack the competence to evaluate their own behaviours .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%