How do you like your books: Print or digital? An analysis on print and e-book usage at the Graduate School of Education

Haugh, Dana

doi:10.1080/1941126x.2016.1243868

Cited by 10 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the poor category, accompanied by a percentage in the very good category (80-100), an increase in the posttest was 19%. The study indicates that new media do not emerge spontaneously and independently; they emerge gradually from the older media metamorphosis [23]. Before the advent of digital books, the reference source used was textbooks which later developed into electronic books (e-books).…”

Section: Evaluation Of Digital Booksmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…For students, the digital book can make it easier to understand learning material and supports national education goals. However, digital books presence plays an important and strategic role in several science fields, including social studies [23].…”

Section: Evaluation Of Digital Booksmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Based on Haghanikar and Hooper research [22], it was explained that teacher education preservice could develop digital books in the United States. On the other hand, digital books are precious for the learning process in universities [23]. Kadry and Ghazal [26] show that the teacher is annoyed with students using smartphones.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Learning Design on Social Studies Through Digital Book in Senior High School

Budiaman

Komarudin

Nuruddin

et al. 2021

Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The diversity of Indonesian society, from ethnicity, religion, race, and class, is a social asset that harmony must be maintained. Multicultural education has an important role in maintaining this harmony. Prospective social science education teachers must have an attractive learning design in increasing understanding related to multicultural education. This study aims to see the effect of digital book learning design on multicultural education for prospective teachers. Researchers collaborated with students of the 2017 social science education study program, faculty of social science, Jakarta State University. Analysis of learning outcomes with two-way MANCOVA analysis with one covariate. The results show the interest in learning multicultural education, a significance value of 0.955 which is greater than 0.05, then H0 is accepted. The significance value obtained from all outputs is 0.000 which is smaller than 0.05, so H0 is rejected. So, it can be concluded that there is an effect of using digital book learning media on students' multicultural education

show abstract

Section: Evaluation Of Digital Booksmentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Evaluation Of Digital Booksmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Learning Design on Social Studies Through Digital Book in Senior High School

Budiaman

Komarudin

Nuruddin

et al. 2021

Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The experience of replacing the deselected printed books with e-books is narrated by Oliva 19 . Haugh 44 and Lugg 45 stated that libraries need both print and electronic books and therefore, there should be proper coordination in selection, acquisition and management of both the types of books. Acquisition of e-books has attracted special attention of e-book researchers.…”

Section: E-books Collection Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trends in E-book Research

Kumbhar

2018

DJLIT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research intended to identify current trends in research on e-books. Specifically it aimed to know the facets of e-books attended to by the research published during 2016. It also intended to review significant results and their supportive or contradictory nature with reference to each other.For this review research literature on e-books was searched from LISA, Emerald, Ebsco, Google Scholar and other databases using the statement ‘e-books OR ebooks’. The query was restricted to journal articles published in English language during January to December 2016. The review finds that the focus of current research on e-books is clearly on usage of e-books. Themes such as e-book collection development and management; search and discovery are also paid more attention to. Usage of e-books by children is emerging as a prominent area of e-book research. Designing of e-books and e-book reading devices are also topics of interest to e-book researchers. Many non-LIS disciplines and professions have interest in researching e-books.

show abstract

“…However, as it also is not clear how much library print book orders are made based upon real information need, various studies have assessed library book circulation for print (Cabezas-Clavijo et al, 2013 ) and ebooks (Cox, 2011 ) or both (e.g. Haugh, 2016 ). Considering this, it would be reasonable to raise concerns about how library holding statistics need to be interpreted in terms of impact.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Why does library holding format really matter for book impact assessment?: Modelling the relationship between citations and altmetrics with print and electronic holdings

Maleki

2021

Scientometrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scholarly books are important outputs in some fields and their many publishing formats seem to introduce opportunities to scrutinize their impact. As there is a growing interest in the publisher-enforced massive collection of ebooks in libraries in the past decade, this study examined how this influences the relationship that library print holdings (LPH), library electronic holdings (LEH) and total library holdings (TLH) have with other metrics. As a follow up study to a previous research on OCLC library holdings, the relationship between library holdings and twelve other metrics including Scopus Citations, Google Books (GB) Citations, Goodreads engagements, and Altmetric indicators were examined for 119,794 Scopus-indexed book titles across 26 fields. Present study confirms the weak correlation levels observed between TLH and other indicators in previous studies and contributes additional evidence that print holdings can moderately reflect research, educational and online impact of books consistently more efficient than eholdings and total holdings across fields and over time, except for Mendeley for which eholdings slightly prevailed. Regression models indicated that along with other dimensions, Google Books Citations frequently best explained LPH (in 14 out of 26 fields), whereas Goodreads User counts were weak, but the best predictor of both LEH and TLH (in 15 fields out of 26), suggesting significant association of eholdings with online uptake of books. Overall, findings suggest that inclusion of eholdings overrides the more impactful counts of print holdings in Total Library Holdings metric and therefore undermines the statistical results, whilst print holdings has both statistically and theoretically promising underlying assumptions for prediction of impact of books and shows greater promise than the general Library Holding metric for book impact assessment. Thus, there is a need for a distinction between print and electronic holding counts to be made, otherwise total library holding data need to be interpreted with caution.

show abstract

How do you like your books: Print or digital? An analysis on print and e-book usage at the Graduate School of Education

Cited by 10 publications

References 10 publications

Learning Design on Social Studies Through Digital Book in Senior High School

Learning Design on Social Studies Through Digital Book in Senior High School

Trends in E-book Research

Why does library holding format really matter for book impact assessment?: Modelling the relationship between citations and altmetrics with print and electronic holdings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About