2001
DOI: 10.1177/0730888401028004005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does Collective Bargaining Affect the Gender Pay Gap?

Abstract: WORK AND OCCUPATIONS Elvira, Saporta / COLLECTIVE BARGAINING The authors study the effect of unionization on gender wage differentials for production workers in nine U.S. manufacturing industries. They find that the wage gap is significantly smaller in unionized establishments for six of the industries, even after controlling for occupation and establishment gender composition. But this union effect does not hold within three industries. The authors conclude that unionization generally reduces wage inequality … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
44
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps one of the most important factors influencing wage determination within firms is whether wages are subject to collective bargaining or not (Elvira and Saporta 2001). This insight is particularly true for Germany, where unions still play an important role in the wage setting process.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Perhaps one of the most important factors influencing wage determination within firms is whether wages are subject to collective bargaining or not (Elvira and Saporta 2001). This insight is particularly true for Germany, where unions still play an important role in the wage setting process.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cornfield (1987) points out that in the case of layoffs bureaucratic rules consequently reduce the potential of discrimination. Elvira and Saporta (2001) apply the same logic to the wage setting process. They argue that the management of unionized firms are more likely to adhere to such bureaucratic wage setting rules, reducing the arbitrariness in wage rates and generating more predictable wages for male and female employees.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The negative union effect may be explained by the reduced wage dispersion among employees covered by the same collective bargaining agreement (see e.g. Freeman andMedoff 1984, Fitzenberger andKohn 2005) and the reduced arbitrariness in the wage setting process (Elvira and Saporta 2001). Also international evidence hint at limited wage dispersion in those countries with centralized collective bargaining, which is -to a great part -caused by a more compressed inter-firm wage dispersion (Blau and Kahn 1999.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%