2003
DOI: 10.1257/000282803321946804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Does Globalization Affect the Synchronization of Business Cycles?

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
235
7
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 379 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
16
235
7
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For Latin America, however, they document that the country specific components to be more dominant owing to the fact that 4 Their methodology closely follows the one in Kose, Otrok, and Whiteman (2003) who decompose the volatility in output, consumption, and investment into the world, region, country, and idiosyncratic components using a sixty-country sample over the 1960-90 period. 5 Several other researchers find relatively stronger business cycle co-movement among developed economies using factor models (see Whiteman, 2007 andCanova, Ciccarelli, andOrtega, 2007) or simple correlations (see Kose, Prasad, and Terrones, 2003).…”
Section: What Do We Know About the North-south Linkages?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Latin America, however, they document that the country specific components to be more dominant owing to the fact that 4 Their methodology closely follows the one in Kose, Otrok, and Whiteman (2003) who decompose the volatility in output, consumption, and investment into the world, region, country, and idiosyncratic components using a sixty-country sample over the 1960-90 period. 5 Several other researchers find relatively stronger business cycle co-movement among developed economies using factor models (see Whiteman, 2007 andCanova, Ciccarelli, andOrtega, 2007) or simple correlations (see Kose, Prasad, and Terrones, 2003).…”
Section: What Do We Know About the North-south Linkages?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, liquidity constraints, imperfect information or regulatory limits to capital flows (indicators of poor financial integration) may lead foreign investors to withdraw capital, reducing investment, GDP and the cross-correlations with other countries. Imbs (2004Imbs ( , 2006 finds that more financially integrated countries are more synchronous (the second effect seems to be dominant) and Kose et al (2003) find that financially open developing economies have synchronized cycles with the G7 countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that the integration of trade and industry processes have a stronger impact on the finance sphere than consumption (Kose, Prasad, & Terrones, 2003). On the one hand, there was blurring of the banks from traditional financial institutions into new more diversified structures.…”
Section: Figure 1 Foreign Direct Investments In Oecd Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%