How Does Our Voice Change as We Age? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Acoustic and Perceptual Voice Data From Healthy Adults Over 50 Years of Age

Abstract

Purpose Approximately 30% of adults over the age of 50 years present with altered vocal function. Our understanding of how these changes manifest acoustically and perceptually is derived from relatively modest-sized studies using a diversity of tools. Voice changes can arise from the onset of disease or disorder, but also age-related physiological changes, which may not reflect pathology as such. Here, we bring together data on acoustic, perceptual, and instrumental assessments (electroglottography), with the aim of gaining a better understanding of the changes occurring across these measurement domains. We consider these changes in the context of different acoustic features, software programs, and perceptual protocols. Method Studies of voice function in healthy older adults over the age of 50 years were sought. Literature was systematically searched with 746 abstracts reviewed. Forty-seven studies were included in the review. A meta-analysis of included studies compared voice acoustic parameters between sex and age. Sixteen acoustic parameters collected from 1,475 participants were analyzed in the meta-analysis. These included some previously unpublished analyses using data provided by authors of included studies. Results Data from the systematic review suggest that older individuals are perceived to present with higher overall scores of dysphonia and roughness, breathiness, strain, and instability. Acoustically, males have significantly higher scores on measures of perturbation, including noise-to-harmonic ratio and absolute jitter. The meta-analysis outcomes suggest that participants aged 80–89 years produce significantly higher fundamental frequency, jitter percent, shimmer percent, and shimmer in decibels compared to participants aged 60–69 years and a significant increase in relative average perturbation, jitter percent, and shimmer in decibels compared to participants aged 70–79 years. Limited data were available comparing acoustic measures using the same acoustic software. Conclusions Variations in fundamental frequency and frequency and amplitude perturbation increase as healthy adults age. It was difficult to draw definitive conclusions based on existing literature due to variability in hardware used, limited descriptions of study cohorts, or missing data from statistical analysis. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.11868663

Radiological correlates of vocal fold bowing as markers of Parkinson’s disease progression: A cross-sectional study utilizing dynamic laryngeal CT

“…A disproportionately elevated GA for a given IAD implies bowing of the vocal folds. Although vocal fold bowing can also occur with ageing due to vocal fold atrophy [22], we showed that the mean/effective maximum IAI is increased in pwPD when compared to age-matched controls. The mean/effective maximum IAI is more…”

Predicting adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) using vocal acoustic features

“…With respect to the role of age in the prediction performance, the features in this study were able to predict age with a comparable if slightly lower performance to other published approaches to investigate the prediction of age using prosodic features [89, 90]. Research on changes of prosody in aging indicates higher scores of hoarseness, instability and breathiness in higher age [91, 92], reflected by a diminished harmony to noise ratio [93]. Moreover, with increasing age, the subglottal pressure decreases in line with a decrease in overall muscle mass, and proband compensate this with increased expiratory airflow [94].…”

Presbyphonia as an Individual Process of Voice Change

“…Voice asthenicity (A3) and breathiness (B3) were observed in 90% of the diagnosed men. Martins et al, 18 Rojas et al, 21 and Rosow et al 23 also used the GRBAS scale in the assessment of Presbyphonia emphasizing its diagnostic usefulness.…”